Tax hike creeps up from 3.75 per cent
March 30th, 2008Confusion caused by new report pegging it at 4.08%
Anthony Reinhart and Jennifer Lewington - Globe and Mail
It’s a small amount, really: the price of a 20-pack of Glad Easy-Tie Garbage Bags or a tube of GE Silicone Sealant for Masonry (Grey) at Canadian Tire.
Larger is the sense of confusion emanating from Toronto City Hall over an apparent $7.19 discrepancy in the proposed property tax increase for homeowners this year.
In January, city finance officials introduced a 2008 budget that called for a 3.75% increase in residential taxes. Late this week, however, that figure appeared to rise to 4.08%, due to the city’s multiyear program to shift more of the property tax burden to homes and away from businesses.
The higher figure, contained in a report this week, would have meant the owner of an average home worth $365,468 would pay $87.89 more in tax this year, or $7.19 more than the promised 3.75% tax hike will produce.
The city’s budget chief, Councillor Shelley Carroll (Don Valley East), was taken aback by the 4.08% figure as she read the report from Joe Pennachetti, the city’s chief financial officer, late Wednesday night.
After the offending number surfaced in a news report yesterday, Ms. Carroll said she will push her council colleagues to stick to the 3.75% increase, while still proceeding with this year’s business-to-residential burden shift.
To pay for it, she will propose taking nearly $5-million out of surplus funds, which were substantially higher than forecast this year.
“I’m going to be moving a motion for an offsetting adjustment to make sure that a pure, simple 3.75% is the tax increase,” she said in an interview yesterday.
“I have been adamant throughout the budget process, in interacting with councillors who make requests for new expenditures on behalf of their residents, that I’m not prepared to say the number four. I’m just not going to do it.”
Ms. Carroll’s vehemence comes as Mayor David Miller nurses wounds from a politically draining battle over new city taxes, new garbage collection fees and rising user fees for recreation.
As it is, critics have assailed Mr. Miller because the 2008 tax increase is above inflation. And it is at odds with his promise to keep the increase “in line” with cost-of-living growth.
Asked why the tax-shift amount hadn’t been factored into the budget before the 3.75% increase was announced, Ms. Carroll said the amount was much larger than usual this year because “we’ve created a new small business class for whom we’re making the shift more quickly.”
To avoid a similar headache in the future, she said she will suggest procedural changes to ensure the tax-shift amount is determined earlier in the process, before proposed tax increases are announced.
Council’s executive committee will consider the new tax rates on Tuesday. Council is expected to vote on the entire $8.2-billion budget early next month.
————————————————————————————————–———-
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information - 416-388-1960