Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Search Results for: ground breaking the modern condo toronto

Libeskind and Gehry free Toronto from the dry functionality of modernism

William Thorsell – The Globe and Mail

On Oct. 10, Daniel Libe­skind will be in Toronto for a “top­ping off” cer­e­mony at the L Tower, a star­tling 57-storey con­do­minium at Yonge and Front streets. Six years ago, Mr. Libe­skind was in town to top off the Michael Lee-Chin Crys­tal at the Royal Ontario Museum (where I was then direc­tor). It’s becom­ing a habit.

These rad­i­cal build­ings are gen­er­at­ing debate in Canada’s pre­miere city, which is fine. But, even bet­ter, they are help­ing to lib­er­ate Toronto from the intel­lec­tual gir­dle of a spent archi­tec­tural age defined by the Inter­na­tional style. David Mirvish proves the case with his dra­matic pro­posal to cre­ate a mon­u­men­tal cul­tural and res­i­den­tial precinct at King and John streets, designed by an unbri­dled Frank Gehry.

The Inter­na­tional style in archi­tec­ture was born of the Bauhaus move­ment in Ger­many after the First World War, rooted in val­ues that sought “rad­i­cally sim­pli­fied forms … ratio­nal­ity and func­tion­al­ity, and the idea that mass pro­duc­tion was rec­on­cil­able with the indi­vid­ual artis­tic spirit.” (Wikipedia is quite good at describ­ing this, not­ing the prob­a­ble con­tra­dic­tion between “mass pro­duc­tion” and individuality.)

The core idea in the Inter­na­tional style was “less is more,” adopted and preached by its lead­ing prac­ti­tioner Mies van der Rohe, a Ger­man archi­tect who decamped to Chicago in the 1930s. It embraced ideals of effi­ciency, rea­son and util­ity. It was, in essence, an ide­ol­ogy – an ide­ol­ogy akin to Puri­tanism, hos­tile to adorn­ment, humour or “waste.” It was an expres­sion of the Machine Age, ascetic indus­tri­al­ism tri­umphant over the roman­ti­cism of art deco, which com­peted along­side the Bauhaus for 15 years after 1925. The Inter­na­tional style in archi­tec­ture ulti­mately pre­vailed in its low-cost dis­ci­pline to become, famously and infa­mously, the Archi­tec­ture of the Box.

Some boxes are bet­ter than oth­ers. Mies van der Rohe’s were the best. As in any period of archi­tec­ture, you will find won­der­ful and awful exam­ples of the genre. The Inter­na­tional style pro­duced some of the most sub­lime forms, spaces and rela­tion­ships in the his­tory of art. Among them is the two-storey bank­ing hall at Mies van der Rohe’s excel­lent TD Cen­tre in Toronto, still the most beau­ti­ful room in the city, though not the most interesting.

The Inter­na­tional style also pro­duced end­less trash in post­war Lon­don and provin­cial cities in North Amer­ica and beyond. The Miesian “box” almost invites low-cost knock­offs because its basic require­ments are so few. It is a short dis­tance from effi­cient to cheap, from “less” to mean. The Inter­na­tional style facil­i­tated dross, not uncom­mon to ide­olo­gies of any stripe, but in the length of its teeth alone, its time has come.

(The last great gasp of mod­ernism was Yoshio Taniguchi’s reit­er­a­tion of the Museum of Mod­ern Art – MOMA – in New York in 2004. How per­fect was this? The cli­max of a century’s ide­ol­ogy in mod­ernist archi­tec­ture at the epi­cen­tre of modernism.)

Where is Toronto now?

Toronto remains ded­i­cated to the Inter­na­tional style, in part because it is cheap to design and build, but out of con­vic­tion too. (The for­est of new con­dos along Lake Ontario south of Front Street is almost homo­ge­neous in its moder­nity, and thus cloy­ing.) A so-called Toronto School of mod­ernist archi­tects has arisen, much admired, bring­ing more sen­sual plea­sure to the strict func­tion­al­ity of the mod­ernist ideal. The best of them – Hariri Pon­tarini, KPMB, Shim-Sutcliffe, Archi­tects Alliance – cre­ate lovely forms and spaces in the mod­ernist style, with an eye to luxe mate­ri­als and indul­gent foils in curves and visual effects. This is mod­ernism in its matu­rity, let­ting go a bit, and it often works very well indeed. It will con­tinue to pass the test of time.

How­ever, Toronto, like Lon­don and New York, is now mov­ing beyond mod­ernism to embrace a new global spirit in archi­tec­ture. It is smartly cap­tured by Denmark’s bad-boy archi­tec­tural star, Bjarke Ingels, who riffs off Mies van der Rohe’s “Less is more” to say that “Yes is more.” (His firm’s name is BIG; their URL is, per­force, big​.dk. New era, eter­nal appeal.) He is say­ing yes to more than effi­ciency; yes to more than def­er­ence to the sta­tus quo.

The mod­ernists’ insis­tence that form fol­low func­tion was deeply informed by efficiency.

The “new archi­tec­ture” keeps func­tion at its cen­tre, but defines func­tion far beyond eco­nom­ics. Func­tion is not only effi­ciency. Func­tion is delight; func­tion is com­plex­ity; func­tion is sur­prise; func­tion is con­tem­pla­tion; func­tion is provo­ca­tion; func­tion is aggres­sion; func­tion is poetry; func­tion is mys­tery; func­tion is doubt; func­tion is love. These are the “func­tions” of art itself, embrac­ing the whole can­vas of human expe­ri­ence and aspi­ra­tion – “arti­tec­ture” unbound from the indus­trial ethic alone.

In fact, before the impor­tant archi­tec­tural events of this decade, Toronto reached beyond the Inter­na­tional style in sev­eral strik­ing moments in its his­tory. It did so when the case for sym­bolic power cried out for much more than another anony­mous box fad­ing into the back­ground. The most amaz­ing of these excep­tions is Toronto City Hall, the result of an inter­na­tional com­pe­ti­tion in 1958 that chose the little-known Finnish archi­tect Viljo Rev­ell to build two fac­ing tow­ers, oft com­pared to hands cradling some­thing – a cir­cu­lar build­ing that has come to be known as “the clam shell” – fronting an expan­sive square on Queen Street. This bla­tant excep­tion to the Inter­na­tional style came to sym­bol­ize Toronto as a place of unusual cre­ativ­ity and poten­tial (against all odds).

Sub­se­quent years saw the arrest­ing rise of the majes­tic CN Tower, Ontario Place and the Eaton Cen­tre (by Eb Zei­dler) – all out­side mod­ernism look­ing in, but deliv­er­ing potent sym­bol­ism to a city with­out a hill, whose lovely lake hid beyond a waste­land of rail yards and free­ways. Almost alone in the con­text of mod­ernism, these rare struc­tures car­ried the bur­den of giv­ing Toronto par­tic­u­lar­ity – a sense that there is, in fact, a here here. (Vic­to­rian neigh­bour­hoods pro­vided the other defin­ing grace.)

And now the dam is break­ing. Will Alsop’s “table­top” struc­ture for OCAD Uni­ver­sity broke the mould in 2004. It’s a charm­ing pop-art plaisan­terie per­fectly suited to the sub­ver­sive nature of the school. In 2007, Mr. Libeskind’s design for the ROM brought an inten­sity and poetic sen­si­bil­ity to bear on Bloor Street of almost unbear­able force (out­side and in). It parted the cur­tain on a new face of beauty, as intel­lec­tu­ally and psy­cho­log­i­cally chal­leng­ing as any­thing built in Toronto before or since – as much origami as a crystal.

Last year, in Mis­sis­sauga, two beau­ti­fully cur­va­ceous “Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe” condo tow­ers designed by Chi­nese archi­tect Yan­song Ma appeared, the result of a rare inter­na­tional com­pe­ti­tion. This month, Mr. Libeskind’s sec­ond major build­ing in Toronto reaches its height at Yonge and Front – a yearn­ing, lean­ing, inquir­ing form that draws the mind to wonder.

David Mirvish is bring­ing Frank Gehry back to Toronto just in time to do some­thing with full con­vic­tion near the end of his impor­tant career. (Mr. Gehry’s work at the Art Gallery of Ontario was sub­stan­tially lim­ited by con­text, how­ever fine that building’s spe­cific attrib­utes.) In Mr. Mirvish’s project, the jux­ta­po­si­tion of exu­ber­ant street-level forms with three proudly tall, “irra­tionally” sculpted tow­ers for hous­ing makes its neigh­bours seem old – as does the L Tower, which makes so much around it seem like the prod­uct of an ide­ol­ogy, rather than an indi­vid­ual, the prod­uct of a sys­tem rather than a soul.

—————————————————————————————————–
Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

—————————————————————————————————–


Incom­ing search terms
  • frank gehry– royal ontario museum
  • bauhaus toronto loft
  • Dundas-Sherbourne poised for a surprising rebirth

    Robyn Doolit­tle – Toronto Star

    With the top down in her bur­gundy con­vert­ible, real­tor Kristyn Wong-Tam was enjoy­ing a sunny sum­mer day as she cruised east along Queen St. towards an office sup­ply store.

    When the light turned red at Sher­bourne St., Wong-Tam was day­dream­ing about legal fold­ers and labels.

    Sud­denly, some­one was scream­ing. A young woman with leath­ery skin and mat­ted blonde hair sprinted into traf­fic, then hurled her petite frame into Wong-Tam’s pas­sen­ger seat.

    Drive! Drive!” the woman shrieked hys­ter­i­cally, div­ing into Wong-Tam’s lap. “They’re going to kill me!”

    But it’s a red light, there’s a car in front of me,” Wong-Tam stammered.

    Within sec­onds, two men appeared on oppo­site sides of the Mer­cedes, madly swing­ing their fists towards the woman. Wong-Tam was receiv­ing the major­ity of the blows.

    The light changed. She hit the gas. In pain and trem­bling with fright, Wong-Tam pulled over a block later to call the police. The woman ran away.

    Two years later, Wong-Tam is the neighbourhood’s city coun­cil­lor. She has never pub­licly spo­ken about the attack, but men­tions it reluc­tantly dur­ing an inter­view as proof of her per­sonal com­mit­ment to turn the area around.

    It won’t be easy.

    Year after year, the down­town east­side con­sis­tently tops every major Toronto police crime indic­tor list. Sim­ply put, this is the area in Toronto where, sta­tis­ti­cally, you are most likely to be shot, stabbed, robbed or sex­u­ally assaulted.

    And while other prob­lem areas of the city — think Cab­bage­town, Leslieville, Park­dale, Regent Park — are cleaned up and gen­tri­fied, Dun­das and Sher­bourne has been left wait­ing for its turn.

    That time is now, says Wong-Tam.

    As builders snap up cheap plots of land, new lux­ury con­dos hit the mar­ket, and city hall plugs away at plans to over­haul its shel­ter sys­tem, Wong-Tam is work­ing to bring together iso­lated com­mu­nity members.

    This per­fect storm of polit­i­cal will and pri­vate devel­op­ment money has city offi­cials, urban plan­ners and real estate investors pre­dict­ing a renais­sance on the Dun­das corridor.

    I would guess that, 10 years from now, you won’t be able to rec­og­nize that area,” said Ernie Light­man, an econ­o­mist at the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto. “To be hon­est, I’m sur­prised it has taken this long.”

    It’s 8 a.m. on George St. The edge of the road is lit­tered with crack cocaine para­pher­na­lia — glass tubes, Brillo pads, chop­sticks — used con­doms and bot­tle caps.

    Wong-Tam is com­ing to check up on a Toronto Com­mu­nity Hous­ing build­ing she vis­ited dur­ing the campaign.

    I was at the front door and a res­i­dent stopped me: ‘You don’t want to go in there,’ they said. It looked like it had never been cleaned — ever.”

    Wong-Tam inher­ited a neigh­bour­hood in trouble.

    The rea­sons are obvi­ous. The solu­tions less so.

    Accord­ing to sta­tis­tics com­piled by Toronto police between 2005 and 2009, which the Star obtained through a free­dom of infor­ma­tion request, the Sher­bourne and Dun­das neigh­bour­hood ranks first in every major crime indi­ca­tor list.

    The area hand­ily beat out neigh­bour­hoods tra­di­tion­ally regarded as trou­bled, such as Jane and Finch, Rogers and Keele, and Weston and Lawrence — areas where community-based polic­ing and social invest­ment have coin­cided with decreas­ing crime rates.

    This has not been the case on the down­town eastside.

    Bor­dered by Carl­ton St. to the north, Par­lia­ment St. to the east, Queen St. to the south and Jarvis St. to the west — an area less than one square kilo­me­tre in size — this tiny quad­rant of the city har­bours three of the city’s largest home­less shel­ters, 32 legal room­ing houses and 14 sus­pected ille­gal ones, more than a dozen aban­doned lots and build­ings, and one of the largest clus­ters of social hous­ing in the city.

    This high con­cen­tra­tion of poverty lures preda­tors from other regions.

    It’s hard to say the exact num­bers, but I bet at least half of the deal­ers live in other parts of the city or not in Toronto at all. They come here because they know there’s a mar­ket,” said Sgt. Mike Ferry, who fre­quently patrols the area with the TAVIS rapid response team.

    And in that same area there are few community-building ameni­ties. No gro­cery stores. No banks. And no friendly neigh­bour­hood pubs, unless you count the Filmore’s strip-club/hotel at the foot of George St.

    Round­ing out the neigh­bour­hood are rows upon rows of expen­sive Vic­to­rian homes, which have been for­ti­fied with 2-metre-high wrought-iron fences.

    It’s prob­a­bly one of the worst-planned areas in the city,” said Wong-Tam.

    And fix­ing that prob­lem is no sim­ple task.

    For her part, the coun­cil­lor has helped resus­ci­tate a Busi­ness Improve­ment Area on Queen St. Wong-Tam, who owns a con­tem­po­rary gallery on Queen West, has been look­ing at ways to entice artists and their fam­i­lies to move into the com­mu­nity. She’s in talks with Artscape about build­ing afford­able homes and work­spaces. And in early May, she’ll be speak­ing with local young moth­ers about get­ting some proper play­ground equip­ment for Allan Gardens.

    I’ve also been meet­ing with devel­op­ers — ‘What do you need? Help me do this. How can we work together?’” she said.

    If it’s true that a healthy neigh­bour­hood is a mixed-income one, the Dun­das cor­ri­dor needs more afflu­ent res­i­dents. Money brings local busi­nesses, which in turn get peo­ple walk­ing and shop­ping on the streets. The more eyes on the street, the safer the neigh­bour­hood becomes.

    But it’s a chicken-and-egg prob­lem, says Light­man, an econ­o­mist with the Uni­ver­sity of Toronto fac­ulty of social work. Peo­ple with means typ­i­cally avoid areas with high crime rates. The neigh­bour­hood needs urban pio­neers to move in, plant roots and start the cycle.

    The thing that Dun­das and Sher­bourne has going for it is that it’s so close to every­thing,” he said. “The prop­erty is too valu­able. You’re already see­ing it. The devel­op­ment is clos­ing in.”

    About four years ago, real estate mogul Brad J. Lamb was handed a seem­ingly impos­si­ble task: find buy­ers for lux­ury lofts at the cor­ner of Jarvis and Queen Sts.

    It wouldn’t be the first ven­ture in the area. Some small-scale devel­op­ment had already taken place to the imme­di­ate south, but the Glasshouse Lofts was the first major project in the embat­tled region.

    The 88-unit con­tem­porar­ily designed condo build­ing would be just one block away from where Wong-Tam was assaulted at Queen and Sher­bourne Sts.

    In 2008, the owner of that corner’s noto­ri­ous Cof­fee Time was arrested for sell­ing mar­i­juana and crack to cus­tomers. Across the street from the dough­nut shop, now a fast-food chicken joint, is Moss Park Arena, where the city’s home­less con­gre­gate, and one of Toronto’s largest shel­ters, the Maxwell Meighen Center.

    It was a tough site. There were lit­er­ally crack­heads shuf­fling in front of the sales office,” said Lamb. “Before I came on, the project had failed at least three times. The devel­oper called me and I said, ‘I can make this work.’”

    Lamb’s advice: Build with the buyer in mind. What types of peo­ple would over­look some neigh­bour­hood grit to be close to the core? Young pro­fes­sion­als. Arsty types. Investors. And what did those peo­ple want? Good-sized apart­ments with mod­ern fin­ishes and a very good price. Don’t bother with 1,000-square-foot units, because that buyer can’t afford them.

    It worked. Glasshouse opened a lit­tle over a year ago.

    Com­ment: Are we for­get­ting the fail­ure of Kor­mann House at the cor­ner of Queen & Sher­bourne? Or the East­side Lofts at Britain Street and Sher­bourne? The neigh­bour­hood is a very very touch sell. There are fan­tas­tic lofts in the area, already built, but I can­not sell them for love or money. No one wants to live there.

    Gavin Mor­ris, a 35-year-old who works in finan­cial tech­nol­ogy, moved in this month.

    It was per­fect. It’s so close to work — the finan­cial dis­trict — the St. Lawrence Mar­ket, my favourite pub, shops. Basi­cally, I now have my whole life in just a few blocks,” he said.

    And what about the less-desirable aspects of the neigh­bour­hood? The pan­han­dlers? The drug dealers?

    I don’t really think about them. I don’t even really notice them,” he said.

    Now The Mod­ern condo is pick­ing up where Glasshouse left off. Peo­ple will be mov­ing in this fall.

    And it’s not the only one. At Shuter and Jarvis Sts., Oxy­gen is slated to be fin­ished for 2013, and nearby Pace Con­dos, at Jarvis and Dun­das Sts., will be fin­ished in 2015.

    With each new devel­op­ment comes thou­sands of dol­lars for the city in lucra­tive Sec­tion 37 fees. Builders can nego­ti­ate larger den­sity and height per­mits in exchange for mak­ing invest­ments in the com­mu­nity, such as a com­mu­nity pool or green space.

    There have not been many large-scale devel­op­ments in the area, so there isn’t a large pool of Sec­tion 37 funds,” said Wong-Tam. “This is what I am hop­ing to change.”

    But just the pres­ence of those con­dos will change things, Lamb believes.

    The Mod­ern lit­er­ally touches that old crack dough­nut shop,” he said. “There’s prob­a­bly 300 con­dos in The Mod­ern, with an aver­age of 1.5 peo­ple liv­ing in each. Now 400 peo­ple are going to descend on the street — and you think they’re going to tol­er­ate crack­heads? They’re not.

    What’s going to hap­pen is huge pres­sure is going to come to bear on that inter­sec­tion. And the police and the city gov­er­nors are going to have to do some­thing about it.”

    Lamb is so sure about this, he’s con­sid­er­ing buy­ing the lot across the street to develop himself.

    It would be a wise invest­ment, said Roger Keil, direc­tor of The City Insti­tute at York University.

    The Dun­das cor­ri­dor is the last fron­tier for down­town devel­op­ment. To the east, the ground­break­ing Regent Park revi­tal­iza­tion has trans­formed a once-dangerous area into a vibrant, even chic, place to live. From the west, mas­sive invest­ments and expan­sion by Ryer­son Uni­ver­sity have added sta­bil­ity and pres­tige to the down­town east­side, said Keil.

    From the north, butting up against once-dangerous St. James Town, three condo devel­op­ments and a host of appli­ca­tions work­ing their way through the sys­tem have flooded the streets with young cou­ples and their dogs. Gen­tri­fi­ca­tion is clos­ing in on all sides.

    The remark­able thing here is the scale and speed at which these things are hap­pen­ing,” said Keil. “This is not the small-scale gen­tri­fi­ca­tion that’s hap­pen­ing in other areas, encroach­ing step by step, block by block, aban­doned build­ing by aban­doned building.”

    But not every­one is convinced.

    Mitchell Kosny, direc­tor of urban plan­ning at Ryer­son Uni­ver­sity, argues the area con­dos tend to exist as lit­tle islands within the community.

    I think the devel­op­ment will help; it will cre­ate more of a fix, but they’re not really con­nected. Peo­ple walk out­side and get right on the street­car or head to their park­ing garage,” he said.

    Fol­low­ing the the­ory that new res­i­dents will push out the home­less pop­u­la­tion, the next ques­tion is: Well, then, where do they go?

    Patri­cia Ander­son, a spokesper­son with the shel­ter, sup­port and hous­ing depart­ment at city hall, said there are no plans to remove any of the shel­ters, but there is a recog­ni­tion that some­thing needs to change.

    We want to return the emer­gency shel­ter pro­gram to its orig­i­nal func­tion. In Toronto, what’s hap­pened with some shel­ters is they’ve become de facto afford­able hous­ing. We’ll be shift­ing from man­ag­ing home­less­ness to end­ing it. We’ve already started doing that now.”

    The area is sat­u­rated, so no more shel­ter beds will be added — there are cur­rently 1,012 in that small region — and there are plans to com­pletely ren­o­vate sev­eral shel­ters, includ­ing the infa­mous Seaton House on George St.

    While the Seaton project is still in its infancy, an Octo­ber 2009 staff report sug­gests city offi­cials are push­ing for a mixed-income and mixed-use devel­op­ment. Retail, stu­dent lodg­ings, office space, per­ma­nent rental hous­ing, as well as improved coun­sel­ing and med­ical sup­port ser­vices, are all on the table.

    And Wong-Tam is going to make sure this isn’t just another city ini­tia­tive that sits on the shelf col­lect­ing dust.

    Every time I see Phil Brown (gen­eral man­ager of the shel­ter, sup­port and hous­ing admin­is­tra­tion), I say: ‘We’ve got to do some­thing spec­tac­u­lar with Seaton House,’” Wong-Tam said.

    Today I bumped into him in the café. He looked at me and said: ‘Don’t say it. I know. We’re going to do it,’” she said. “And that’s just the beginning.”

    ———————————————————————————————————————
    Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

    Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
    who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    ———————————————————————————————————————


    Incom­ing search terms
  • scar­bor­ough bluffs cliff­side crime
  • corso italia gentrification
  • 500 sher­bourne crime
  • vince moli­naro threatened
  • glasshouse lofts floorplans
  • glasshouse lofts toronto floor plans
  • sofie 500 sher­bourne cell phone
  • 500 sher­bourne as a real estate investment
  • Toronto’s five new luxury hotels

    Over the next cou­ple of years, this city will get five new lux­ury hotels. It starts with the Thomp­son, which opens its high-concept doors this month and promises to be ground zero for the beau­ti­ful peo­ple

    Maryam Sanati – Toronto Life

    Lately, King West is an urban cloud nine: designer con­dos, old brick stu­dio spaces, fan­tas­tic carpac­cio. Only 15 years ago, no one had much rea­son to ven­ture down here—not for work, not to live, not for a din­ing scene, because there wasn’t one. There were no ad agen­cies, no Susur Lee joints, no Spoke Club and cer­tainly no bou­tique hotels. But now the dozen or so blocks bounded by Spad­ina and Bathurst, from Ade­laide down to Welling­ton, are a hum­ming, self-sustaining ecosystem—a model of how to retro­fit a vin­tage down­town neighbourhood.

    Real estate agents call this part of town King West Vil­lage, a han­dle the locals find too arti­fi­cial to pass their lips, espe­cially con­sid­er­ing the place isn’t yet fully formed. At every turn, there’s a con­struc­tion site, or a gap­ing hole in the ground, or a lot with a tar­get on its back, almost all of them bear­ing the same sig­nage: an art­ful graphic in lower case let­ters say­ing “freed.” It’s not an exis­ten­tial­ist state­ment; “Freed” stands for Peter Freed, the For­est Hill–bred devel­oper who has nine projects on the go in the area. No one has been a big­ger cat­a­lyst of the evo­lu­tion of King West, or cap­i­tal­ized on it more, than Freed. His real estate port­fo­lio, mainly con­dos, is worth $1 bil­lion, and much of it is geared to a highly spe­cific breed: a 35-ish, design-obsessed demo­graphic that wears Japan­ese denim, lis­tens to Phoenix, works in adver­tis­ing or bank­ing or con­sults in high tech, trav­els often and widely, and stays at prop­er­ties designed by Ian Schrager, the Man­hat­tan entre­pre­neur often cred­ited with found­ing the bou­tique hotel genre. In King West, Freed has pre­pared a land­ing strip for these hip­ster high fly­ers (and those who aspire to become them). They’re not rich, nec­es­sar­ily. Their ambi­tion is to be taste­fully in the know.

    For them, Freed has invested in a crown­ing achieve­ment, a glee­fully antic­i­pated light box on Welling­ton: the 102-room Thomp­son Toronto, which is sched­uled to open its high-concept doors this month.

    The Thomp­son Toronto is the first inter­na­tional arm of a New York brand, and it comes to a city that’s been slow to embrace its kind. Bou­tiques or “genre hotels” pour art and fash­ion from a cock­tail shaker. Guests see them as anti-generic, even though many are now multi­na­tional chains. The best of them become cul­tural hubs, a scene of art shows and film screen­ings staffed by mod­e­lesque bar­tenders. The Amer­i­can hote­lier André Bal­azs calls his bou­tique chain The Stan­dard, pre­sum­ably since that’s what it wants to be: the mea­sure of vitality.

    Mon­treal saw the rise of bou­tiques in the early 2000s while the Toronto hotel mar­ket stood rel­a­tively still (unless you count the mas­sive over­haul of the Wind­sor Arms, which had closed a tatty shell in 1991 and reopened ele­gantly in 1999). The last real estate bub­ble made investors skit­tish, and the city’s infe­ri­or­ity com­plex fed the ret­i­cence. Were we world class? Not enough to deserve a bunch of nice hotels. Now, the GTA has swag­ger: a pop­u­la­tion boom, a cul­tural rebirth to flesh out its mer­its as a des­ti­na­tion, and for­eign investors snap­ping up our real estate.

    In the first blush of these changes, well before the econ­omy turned, devel­op­ers began plan­ning sev­eral hotel projects to keep in step with the growth. The Ritz-Carlton, the new Four Sea­sons, the Trump Inter­na­tional and the Shangri-La should be com­pleted by 2012, at which point the city will have more than 1,000 new lux­ury rooms to rent. The big four will be con­sid­ered five-stars, in the rank­ings of the hotel world. (Until now, Toronto’s only five-star has been the two-year-old Hazel­ton Hotel in York­ville.) They come with alti­tude, rang­ing from 52 to 66 storeys.

    At least a third of each of these struc­tures will be reserved for pri­vate res­i­dences, the con­do­mini­ums that make the devel­op­ments pos­si­ble. Banks are extremely reluc­tant to loan money for stand-alone hotels, deemed too costly and risky; pre-selling con­dos not only helps devel­op­ers get financ­ing, but their rev­enue boosts hotel oper­a­tions in trou­bled times. The condo own­ers also pro­vide hotels with an indige­nous population.

    Toronto's five new luxury hotels

    Toronto’s five new lux­ury hotels

    Pri­vate res­i­dences cater to a velvet-robe-and-slippers crowd that wants the elevator-ride avail­abil­ity of a concierge and full-service spa, not to men­tion access to maids and room ser­vice. Those perks are sell­ing points at the Thomp­son, too. And they’ll be a strate­gic piece of the King Edward Hotel, bought this past March by a group of own­ers headed by the Israeli-born devel­oper Gil Blutrich. (A vast revamp is in the works.) It’s also the plan for Bisha, a 41-storey bou­tique devel­op­ment on Blue Jays Way led by the night­club impre­sario Charles Khabouth.

    As for cost, Thompson’s con­dos run about $600 a square foot, while hotel guests will be asked to pay $300 or so a night. The five-stars have found buy­ers will­ing to pay $1,500 a square foot and, when they’re com­pleted, will drive up the thresh­old for room rates to well over $500 a night. And up and up and up until, who knows, a decade from now, we might lament the folly of new hote­liers in a sat­u­rated mar­ket. But for now, Toronto is open for business.

    Peter Freed was a born entre­pre­neur, if you ask his mother, Hazel, who says he’s been sell­ing stuff since he was in kinder­garten. “When he was five,” she recalls, “Peter made about 20 paint­ings, took them around the neigh­bour­hood in his lit­tle red wagon, and sold them all.” His father was a lawyer, and the young Freed would inter­ro­gate his dad’s clients when they came to the house: “My name is Peter Freed. What do you do?” At age seven or eight, he mar­shalled neigh­bour­hood pals to col­lect tools, wood and five-inch nails. He out­lined the specs of a fort, and it was built in a day.

    To earn money as a teen, he hauled boxes as a shipper-receiver for a King West jeans com­pany and, in his early 20s, laboured for a con­trac­tor. Work­ing on sub­di­vi­sion con­struc­tion in the outer sub­urbs, he saved $75,000 and invested it in build­ing town­houses in North York. After that project, he was offi­cially a devel­oper, and another 1,000 town­houses soon followed.

    Freed had always liked the build­ings around the Rot­ter­dam pub, a ’90s insti­tu­tion on King West, and it was here that he saw pos­si­bil­i­ties. Freed Devel­op­ments opened its King West head­quar­ters four years ago. His mom works for him now, from time to time. “I call myself the fac­to­tum,” she says jok­ingly. Right now, she’s orga­niz­ing an office move.

    An under­stated guy—not the ego­ma­ni­a­cal cow­boy that’s often the car­i­ca­ture of a developer—Freed knows his lim­i­ta­tions. The Thomp­son is his first hotel, which is why he part­nered in the deal with Tony Cohen, who in 1998 founded a restaurant-and-hotel invest­ment and man­age­ment com­pany called Global Edge. Though Cohen’s expe­ri­ence in hotels isn’t vast, he has been through good cycles and bad since open­ing Toronto’s Hotel le Germain—one of the city’s ear­li­est boutiques—in 2003 with the Ger­main fam­ily, sea­soned Quebec-based hote­liers. Cohen is 37 years old, a for­mer Mon­trealer with movie-star looks and an affa­ble way. He wears Pal Zileri made-to-measure and is fix­ated on the finer points of design—in other words, he’s exactly the Thomp­son demographic.

    Freed, who’s 41, has aes­thetic inter­ests, too. His pent­house atop 66 Port­land Avenue—his first real estate devel­op­ment in the area—is 6,600 metic­u­lous square feet, half of that space a ter­race with a pool. He has said that his com­pany caters to “a down­town, design-oriented, play-hard, work-hard, fashion-savvy buyer”—cheesy but accurate—and his cor­po­rate tag line is “design based devel­op­ment.” He has hired local fash­ion design­ers, includ­ing Bus­tle and Smythe, to dec­o­rate floors of Fash­ion House, his loft devel­op­ment at 560 King West. But his per­sonal style is more casual than Cohen’s. He wears jeans, an untucked dress shirt and, on the after­noon I met with him, the look of heart­burn on his face. He was just days away from the birth of his first child, a son named Rowan, and a mat­ter of weeks away from the open­ing of the Thomp­son. “I have a lot of nights when I’m think­ing about the project,” he said, “toss­ing and turn­ing, half asleep, half awake.”

    The Thomp­son hotel and con­dos, which will cost roughly $50 mil­lion to build, had already bro­ken ground by the time the econ­omy fal­tered in the fall of 2008. By the fol­low­ing year, occu­pancy lev­els in Toronto had reached a low of 60%, while hotel rates fell by nine%. Hotels mea­sure suc­cess on a fac­tor called Revpar, or rev­enue per avail­able room, and in 2009, that mea­sure fell by 16.3% to $75—pretty much a night­mare sce­nario. This year, things are look­ing up, but only by a point or two. The busi­ness is immensely depen­dent on the long term, on sus­tain­ing a fol­low­ing even when the ini­tial open­ing buzz dies down, on a solid busi­ness travel mar­ket, and on rid­ing out what­ever calamity the world eco­nomic order brings.

    So much is up to the gods. But what Freed and Cohen can con­trol is the style of the place. Just look at the way Jeff Sto­ber mashed up bou­tique cool at the Drake on Queen West. The Thomp­son, for its part, has Freed’s trade­mark “live hard, play hard” way about it, which fits King West, though it sug­gests a cut­off age of about 45. As the “man­i­festo” of the Thomp­son group explains, the hotels are cre­ated for “good-looking rev­o­lu­tion­ar­ies” who “col­lect Hiroshi Sug­i­moto pho­tographs, vin­tage Zippo lighters, match­books from cafés, quotes and, one day, Basquiat.” Those who don’t nat­u­rally iden­tify with these asso­ci­a­tions might just as hap­pily take this as a recipe for how to build a personality.

    Like the Ritz, the Trump and the rest, the Thomp­son has had a long incubation—six years—during which money was secured, deals closed, designs made, and enough res­i­dences sold to enable con­struc­tion. To date, Freed and Cohen have found buy­ers for 315 of the 336 Thomp­son con­dos at 550 Welling­ton. Freed has also bought a nearby lot, for­merly a Trav­elodge motel, where 315 more Thomp­son Res­i­dences are now for sale. That makes a total of 651 Thomp­son con­dos to 102 hotel rooms, which means this is fun­da­men­tally a res­i­den­tial devel­op­ment with a bou­tique hotel piece, rather than vice versa.

    When they came together, Freed and Cohen were pre­oc­cu­pied with the food and bev­er­age rudi­ments of the hotel, and they trav­elled widely for research—Manhattan, L.A., Paris. They knew they’d have to offer some­thing spe­cial. King West is flush with options (Marc Thuet, Rod­ney the oys­ter guy, Le Sélect Bistro, and so on), so for the all-important culi­nary bench­mark, Freed and Cohen decided to bring in Scar­petta, an out­post of Scott Conant’s high-Italian New York restau­rant. It will be one of three on the prop­erty, along with a chic 24-hour diner and a 150-seat off­shoot of the Muskoka-based sushi spot Wabora.

    These guys have a sharp sense of how their demo­graphic works. The Thomp­son brand is a strong hook. Their tar­get will have stayed at 60 Thomp­son or Smyth Tribeca in New York, or have read about it. They will have eaten at Scar­petta, or have heard about it. And as much as they’d never admit it, the idea of New York com­ing to them—mountain to Mohammed—makes them weak-kneed. Tak­ing their Sugimoto-loving selves for mac-and-cheese in the diner at 3 a.m. is a plus.

    Then there’s the Thompson’s look: a glow­ing white under­lit bar in the lobby, canopied by a hand-blown glass-and-bronze chan­de­lier; dis­tressed wide-plank floor­boards from Europe; mod­ernist fur­nish­ings from names you read in Wall­pa­per; a plush 40-seat Hol­ly­wood mogul–style screen­ing room; leather-wrapped and mir­rored walls in the pent­house suite; a rooftop infin­ity pool and bar; and on street level, next to a dra­matic “din­ing pavil­ion” and fac­ing the his­toric Vic­to­ria Memo­r­ial Park, a reflec­tive pool in sum­mer that becomes an ice rink in win­ter. (I still recall the day I bought a tuna sand­wich from the Globe and Mail cafe­te­ria and walked to this park, then des­o­late and depress­ing, and had the loneli­est 20 min­utes of my life. Times have changed.)

    Most idio­syn­cratic of all is a 125-by-12-foot, hand-painted lobby mural pro­duced by the Philippe Starck of Spain, Javier Mariscal. A Valen­cian artist and designer of land­scapes and inte­ri­ors, Mariscal is con­sid­ered a brand­ing auteur by his cor­po­rate clients, which included the Barcelona Olympic Games. The piece for the Thomp­son is an inter­pre­ta­tion of the Toronto sky­line, set on a jet-black back­ground, with the build­ings painted in lumi­nous white strokes, almost like light­ning flashes. Every few feet, the mural will go 3-D, so that cer­tain build­ings will appear to punch free from the wall, as if break­ing out of the munic­i­pal grid. The piece, in Tony Cohen’s words, takes this “ever-expanding sky­line and rein­ter­prets it in a whim­si­cal way with­out los­ing the seri­ous­ness of it.”

    Cohen says the part­ners spent “well into the six fig­ures” to light the art and design fea­tures of the hotel, so an illu­mi­nated mural will be vis­i­ble to passersby on Welling­ton. Cohen and Freed think that every­one who arrives at the Thompson’s doorstep—and not just overnight guests, but you and I and the next-door neighbour—might linger over the piece to pick out their touch­stones and land­marks. Another inven­tion, then, from this part of King West: bou­tique civic pride.

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion  -  416−388−1960

    ————————————————————————————————————–


    Incom­ing search terms
  • king edward hotel toronto haunted
  • brick stu­dio toronto
  • patrick ducharme wind­sor networth
  • lux­ury hotel elevator
  • lux­ury stu­dio spaces toronto