Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Search Results for: ottawa housing market forecast 2012

Fearing crash, Toronto condo builders retreat

Bloomberg News

Toronto condo builders are slow­ing devel­op­ment in a bid to avoid a crash after a decade-long boom led to 159 tow­ers now under construction.

Com­ment: Are they slow­ing down for that rea­son, or are you just cre­at­ing a newsy head­line? Have builders told you this? No? Ah right, so it could just be a lull, a sea­sonal thing. Maybe because of the ter­ri­ble weather we had all of the first part of this year? Maybe the city was slow with per­mits? Could be 100 dif­fer­ent rea­sons, but you are going to spec­u­late the worst rea­son you can think of so that the news looks bad. Nice…

So far this year, they’ve announced 13 new con­do­minium projects, the fewest since the reces­sion in 2009, when there were just three over the same period, fig­ures from real estate researcher Real­Net Canada Inc. show. In the same period last year, 29 new projects were announced, includ­ing Tridel Corp.’s Ten York, the third-tallest res­i­den­tial tower in the coun­try at 75-stories when it was first marketed.

Com­ment: Q1 2012 had 20 degree weather on Feb­ru­ary – we have feet of snow the same time this year. If you don’t know that real estate is weather-dependent, then you have no right writ­ing real estate stories.

Most devel­op­ers have their hands in their pock­ets right now,” said Brad Lamb, pres­i­dent of Brad J. Lamb Realty Inc., a devel­oper and the city’s largest con­do­minium bro­ker. His firm, which is mar­ket­ing more than 45 high-rise devel­op­ments in the city, won’t start a new project until 2014, Lamb said in an inter­view at Bloomberg’s office in Toronto. Lamb said he has eight projects in Toronto and Ottawa “on the draw­ing board.”

Com­ment: Yet he did not say that he was not build­ing because he was afraid and was try­ing to avoid a crash. Does Mr. Lamb know you put those words in his mouth, by impli­ca­tion? I would think he would not like that very much.

The slow­down comes as a near-record sup­ply of con­dos comes to mar­ket in a city with the most tow­ers being con­structed in the world, accord­ing to BuzzBuz­zHome, a Toronto-based real estate list­ings and research firm. Devel­op­ers are try­ing to man­age the slow­down as buy­ers retreat amid tighter mort­gage rules, a slow­ing econ­omy and the bur­den of record con­sumer debt.

Com­ment: Comes to mar­ket? You mean com­plete. That means that units that are already BOUGHT AND PAID FOR are done and peo­ple take pos­ses­sion of them. They are not being offered for sale and flood­ing the mar­ket. Fig­ures from Real­net, who you quote above, show that around 10% of new con­dos are offered for sale once the own­ers take title. So even a heavy year like 2013 will be, with some 28,000 com­ple­tions, will see around 2,800 new list­ings added to an annual sales total of around 85,000. So maybe 3% more… wow… so much extra inven­tory, what will we ever do?

The sup­ply of new high-rise units reached 21,262 in Feb­ru­ary, 34% more than the same period a year ago and close to a record 21,696 in Octo­ber 2012, Real­Net fig­ures show. About 61,000 units are cur­rently under con­struc­tion — the most ever — and a record 35,757 res­i­den­tial units will come on stream next year, Real­Net said.

Com­ment: Clar­ify your data. Are there 21,262 new con­dos cur­rently for sale? And the 35,757 com­ing “on stream” – what does that mean? Built? Sold? Offered on MLS? You are throw­ing around num­bers that mean noth­ing. Like 61,000 units for sale. It can take 3 years or more for a large tower to be built, once ground is bro­ken. Those 61,000 units could com­plete this year through to 2016 or beyond. It means nothing.

Can­celed lumen

Devel­oper Con­cord Adex post­poned its pre­vi­ously announced Lumen this year, a 30-story build­ing in a clus­ter of con­dos near the Gar­diner Express­way, a major high­way that con­nects the west­ern sub­urbs with the city, accord­ing to BuzzBuzzHome.

Com­ment: Why did they can­cel it? No sales? Crappy design? Bed­rooms with cars zoom­ing past the win­dows? Did they need 38 storeys to make finan­cial sense and the city would only approve 30 storeys? You can­not sim­ply through stuff like this around with­out con­text. Unless you are just try­ing to write a neg­a­tive story.

Menkes Devel­op­ment Ltd was one of the first to announce this year, putting its 29-story 365 Church devel­op­ment on sale for pur­chase in March. Due for com­ple­tion in 2017, unit size starts at 323 square feet among the small­est in the city.

Condo prices are not going up now the way they have been,” said Finn Poschmann, vice pres­i­dent of research at the C.D. Howe Insti­tute in Toronto. “From the devel­op­ers’ side, they’re say­ing, ‘OK, enough is enough right now. We’re digest­ing a shift in the mar­ket as it is, and we really don’t need to be beat up more.’”

Com­ment: Builders have real­ized that they have hit the wall in terms of what first time buy­ers and investors will buy. But they are shrink­ing units, which pushes up the cost per square foot. Trust me, con­dos are not going down in price any time soon.

Sales drop­ping

Sales of high-rise homes in the city have dropped 34% since 2011 after ris­ing 64% in the past decade until 2012. Prices have declined 5.5% over the past two years, accord­ing to RealNet.

Com­ment: New con­dos we are talk­ing about here, let’s be clear. And if there are a record num­ber of com­ple­tions, how could there be less sales? More com­pleted con­dos means more were bought. And tak­ing a slice out of a longer term is cherry pick­ing the data. Your two data sets over­lap – how could sales drop from 2011–2013 when sales rose from 2002–2012? If sales rose in 2011 and 2012, how did they drop? Your math makes no sense…

Sales are weak­en­ing after the gov­ern­ment tight­ened mort­gage rules to curb record house­hold debt and orches­trate a so-called “soft land­ing” in the hous­ing mar­ket. Bench­mark inter­est rates held at 1% since 2009 in the longest pause since the 1950s stoked a hous­ing boom. The gov­ern­ment has been try­ing to rein it in, short­en­ing amor­ti­za­tions in June to 25 years from 30 years, the fourth time in four years it tight­ened home loan reg­u­la­tions. The Office of the Super­in­ten­dent of Finan­cial Insti­tu­tions also intro­duced tougher stan­dards for lenders.

Com­ment: And it worked – sales fell around 10–15%. But once we hit July and have two months with the same mort­gage rules, we will not be talk­ing about less sales any­more. The funny part is that num­bers will prob­a­bly rise again through the end of next year and will look strong against the weaker 2012 num­bers. And the press will go on about ris­ing sales – just as they did about the drop­ping sales – with no con­text. Mark my words!

The gov­ern­ment has also pres­sured banks not to cut home loan lend­ing rates below 3%, with Finance Min­is­ter Jim Fla­herty say­ing March 19 that “we don’t want a race to the bot­tom on mort­gage rates.” Man­ulife Finan­cial Corp. with­drew a pro­mo­tional 2.89% five-year fixed mort­gage rate after the finance depart­ment called the bank to express the minister’s “displeasure.”

Com­ment: No, Fla­herty did not tell banks to stay above 3% – he just said he was not happy when BMO offered the lower rate. They responded by offer­ing 2.79% to their best clients, secretly. And I have seen ads in CIBC offer­ing 2.99% mort­gages with 3% cash back.

Gov­er­nor warns

The effect of the government’s focus on rates and bor­row­ing was that many first-time home buy­ers were priced out of the mar­ket and grew cau­tious as Mark Car­ney, the Bank of Canada gov­er­nor, empha­sized the risk to an over-heated hous­ing mar­ket, Poschmann said.

Every­one knows that soft land­ings are dif­fi­cult to nego­ti­ate,” Poschmann said. “So you use mul­ti­ple tools, you push on mul­ti­ple but­tons, and that’s what the gov­ern­ment has done.”

Com­ment: And finally one worked. But most first-timers will just wait and save more, or buy some­thing dif­fer­ent, or look out­side the 416.

Investors are begin­ning to hear about the high amount of sup­ply and are back­ing off, Will Dun­ning, pres­i­dent of real estate mar­ket analy­sis firm Will Dun­ning Inc., said in a phone inter­view from Toronto. The government’s mort­gage tight­en­ing has taken at least a quar­ter of con­do­minium buy­ers off the mar­ket, he said.

Com­ment: No, they cer­tainly are not. Why would they? Not when they can buy a condo and have a line up to rent it out. Vacancy rates are like 0.8% now, there are bid­ding wars on rentals. Land­lords have their pick of ten­ants. This is exactly what investors want. I have heard from builders that they are bang­ing on their doors ask­ing why they are not build­ing. The buy­ers taken out of the mar­ket are first-time buy­ers, owner-occupiers, not investors.

Attrac­tive investment

Low inter­est rates made con­dos a very attrac­tive invest­ment, I wouldn’t say a bub­ble but I would say too much activ­ity,” he said. “There are mul­ti­ple out­comes, includ­ing the investor say­ing ‘It’s time to get out of this mar­ket’ and if a lot of them say that at the same time, then you see prices fall.”

Com­ment: No bub­ble. There is no sud­den increase, in sales or prices. Prices have risen around 3–8% annu­ally since 1996 – how is that a bub­ble? And take off 2% for infla­tion, so it is more like 1–6%. Whoo. And sales have remained awfully steady for a decade now, how is that a bub­ble? Sure, more con­dos that houses, but if you can’t see the demo­graph­ics behind that, then I can’t help you.

Prices of single-family homes in the city are con­tin­u­ing to rise due to the lack of avail­able prop­er­ties and space con­straints on build­ing. Homes are at a record pre­mium of $204,000 ($200,866) to their high-rise coun­ter­parts, accord­ing to Real­Net data. Since 2009, condo prices have risen steadily 25%, com­pared to a 45% spike for low-rises over the same period.

Com­ment: The dif­fer­ence can be even higher than that. I think you are talk­ing new, since Real­net tracks new devel­op­ments. But in the resale mar­ket, con­dos are aver­ag­ing around $350–360,000 while detached homes are now over $900,000 – on average.

Still the Toronto Real Estate Board, or TREB, fore­casts the slow­est over­all growth since 2008 this year, with aver­age home prices of $515,000 in 2013, a 3.6% advance over 2012. The board fore­casts 80,000 total hous­ing sales this year, a 6.5% decline from last year and what would be the steep­est decline since 2008.

Com­ment: What? We are now call­ing “only” a 3.6% price rise a prob­lem? This is a sign of some­thign bad? Seri­ously? Peo­ple used to say 8% annual increases were a sure bub­ble, now 3.6% is a sign of mar­ket col­lapse? Really? And we tend to for­get that 2011 was a crazy year and last year would have been just as bad had the new mort­gage rules not changed things halfway through the year. If we have 80–85,000 sales, then it is right in line with the 10-year trend. Again, not the begin­ning of the apoc­olypse. Please, con­text folks. Saves me a lot of typing!

Two mar­kets

It’s a tale of two mar­kets when it comes to price growth,” said Jason Mer­cer, head econ­o­mist at TREB. “On the low-rise side of the mar­ket it’s been extremely tight. There’s a lot of com­pe­ti­tion out there and lots of inven­tory. On the condo side, you’ve got quite a bit of supply.”

Com­ment: Yet they both sell and both increase in value over time.

The boom in some ways has helped reg­u­late the sup­ply com­ing to mar­ket, Lamb said. Devel­op­ers are all simul­ta­ne­ously build­ing a record num­ber of units, which means there isn’t enough con­struc­tion equip­ment such as cranes, or enough work­ers to go around, delay­ing sales, con­struc­tion, and occu­pancy. Devel­op­ers saw this com­ing more than a year ago, Lamb said.

That may not be enough to engi­neer a soft-landing.

We had a hous­ing bub­ble in 1989 that burst, so there’s an exam­ple of where the gov­ern­ment pol­icy did not cre­ate a soft land­ing,” Craig Alexan­der, senior econ­o­mist at Toronto-Dominion Bank, said in a phone inter­view from Toronto. “Real estate has gen­er­ally been more volatile than the over­all econ­omy and it’s tended to under­per­form dur­ing reces­sions and then rebound early in the eco­nomic recovery.”

Com­ment: There was no gov­ern­ment pol­icy in 1989. Peo­ple went crazy spec­u­lat­ing and pushed prices up 127% in about 15 months. Then, it stopped. Dead. And prices dropped. But they never went below where they were when it began. Sure, if you bought at the peak you had to wait until about 2006 to see your house worth the same again, but that was some­thing very very dif­fer­ent than now. Peo­ple need to stop com­par­ing it. A 127% jump in a lit­tle over a year is very dif­fer­ent that 5–6% a year for a decade and a half.

Land demand

Demand for space to develop down­town remains strong. Res­i­den­tial land trans­ac­tions hit a record $2.75 bil­lion dol­lars last year, encom­pass­ing all trans­ac­tions for res­i­den­tial prop­erty, land to build res­i­den­tial prop­er­ties, and for mixed– use pur­poses, accord­ing to RealNet.

Hous­ing starts have also begun to rise again after reach­ing the low­est level in almost two years in Jan­u­ary. They rose for a sec­ond month in Feb­ru­ary to a 184,028 annual rate.

On lower vol­ume, the hous­ing price is still creep­ing higher — in the equity mar­ket that doesn’t last, it’s a diver­gence,” said Jef­frey Burchell, fund man­ager at Aston Hill Finan­cial Inc., which man­ages $6.7 bil­lion in North Amer­ica. “You run for the hills when you see that.”

Com­ment: What? That does not even make sense to me… And why are we ask­ing an asset man­ager to com­ment on real estate? I don’t com­ment on the stock market.

Aston Hill owns shares of Inter­Rent Real Estate Invest­ment Trust, an Ottawa-based res­i­den­tial mul­tires­i­dence man­ager that owns about 4,700 units in Ontario.

If you see the mar­ket going up on low vol­ume, you just sell every­thing and walk away for a while,” Burchell said. “It’s bizarre that hous­ing prices are still going up but volume’s down because all it does is it takes less to tip it all over.”

Com­ment: That does not make sense either. If vol­ume is down, it is because there is less sup­ply. High demand and low sup­ply means lower over­all sales. High demand and lower sup­ply also pushes prices up. I am con­fused how this is read as a bad thing.

—————————————————————————————————–
Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

—————————————————————————————————–


Incom­ing search terms
  • emer­ald city con­dos don mills shep­pard phase 1 completion
  • toronto hotel condo bubble
  • condo con­trac­tors toronto
  • land for sale
  • toronto condo sales down again in april apr 13 2013
  • Will nervous first-time buyers make this spring housing market bloom?

    Tara Perkins – The Globe and Mail

    With the spring sell­ing sea­son approach­ing, all eyes are on a cru­cial seg­ment of the real estate mar­ket – the first-time home buyer.

    It’s a group that includes peo­ple such as Tyler Padley and his wife Jamie McGov­ern, who have been rent­ing in the west end of Toronto and are now look­ing to buy their first house and start a fam­ily. Like many prospec­tive home­own­ers, they are strug­gling to find what they want at a price they can afford – even though they’ve saved up a siz­able down pay­ment. With the aver­age home price hov­er­ing at around $510,000, they’re real­iz­ing they may have to set­tle for a place that’s smaller or fur­ther from the city’s core than they wanted – assum­ing they take the plunge at all.

    Whether this cou­ple, or oth­ers like them, choose to wade into the mar­ket will deter­mine whether Canada’s hous­ing mar­ket begins to recu­per­ate or con­tin­ues to weaken this spring. New entrants are a crit­i­cal part of what makes the mar­ket tick: For every first-time buyer, there’s an owner who’s look­ing to sell and trade up, and for every upgrade, there’s a retiree look­ing to cash out. The “trickle-up” effect can make the dif­fer­ence between hot and cold in the market.

    This year, the big ques­tion is: Will the first-timers come back? Many were dri­ven away last sum­mer by Ottawa’s new rules on home loans, which banned mort­gage insur­ers from cov­er­ing any mort­gage with an amor­ti­za­tion period of longer than 25 years. It was an effort to cool the mar­ket amid fears that house prices and con­sumer debt lev­els were grow­ing at alarm­ing rates, and it worked: Prop­erty sales have been sink­ing ever since.

    Com­ment: And there was a hit on the low $1 mil­lion mar­ket as well. Sud­denly if you had $150,000 you could not buy a $1 mil­lion house because you could not get mort­gage insur­ance. Amaz­ing that a cou­ple mak­ing $200,000/year with $150,000 cash to put down would not be able to buy a house for $1,000,000. Cou­ple that with the dent in the bot­tom of the mar­ket and you had a prob­lem. Sorry, have a problem.

    Data from seven large cities sug­gest that last month’s sales nation­ally are about 12% lower than a year ago, BMO Nes­bitt Burns econ­o­mist Dou­glas Porter said in a research note this week. “It still seems that the much greater risk is that sales weaken fur­ther, not that they sur­prise to the high side,” he wrote.

    Com­ment: No, the mort­gage changes imme­di­ately changed things. The mar­ket can only rise from here, as peo­ple save more money. Things will sta­bi­lize, but sales will stay in the 80–85,000/year range, rather than push­ing 100,000. This is totally in line with the 10-year aver­age, so it is not a big deal. Wel­come to the new nor­mal, a lit­tle less crazy than before.

    Prices remain stub­bornly high in most urban mar­kets. Fitch, a rat­ings agency, said this week that prices nation­ally are about 20% too high. Such head­lines add to the fear among first-time buy­ers that, even if they can afford to get into the mar­ket, now might not be the time.

    Com­ment: They are nobody and one opin­ion car­ries no weight against 100,000 that are dif­fer­ent. Ignore it and carry on.

    It’s tough to gauge exactly how many first timers are stay­ing away. “There’s no real hard sta­tis­tics on the num­ber of first-time buy­ers that are in the mar­ket,” says Shaun Hilde­brand, senior mar­ket ana­lyst in Ontario at Canada Mort­gage and Hous­ing Corp. But one of the ways the hous­ing agency attempts to track it in Toronto is to look at the share of sales that are below $400,000. That was 45% in 2012, down from 52% in 2011, “so that’s one of the indi­ca­tors that we use to sug­gest that first-time buy­ing has slowed down,” Mr. Hilde­brand says.

    Com­ment: That is just dumb. Most invest­ment pur­chases are con­dos in the $250–350,000 range – and investors are cer­tainly not first time buy­ers. There are only 300 detached houses in the 416 for less than $500k – I would sug­gest that $500k is the new starter home price. That is what my first time buy­ers are spend­ing, gen­er­ally in the $450-600k range. They are using a com­pletely arbi­trary value that has no basis in reality.

    Another is the rental mar­ket: Canada’s most pop­u­lous city saw more con­dos rented out over the Mul­ti­ple List­ing Ser­vice than sold over MLS dur­ing 2012, he notes. And the trickle-up effect is under way in that city.

    Com­ment: This is where many of the under-$400k sales come from, investors buy­ing con­dos to rent them out.

    The first seg­ment of the mar­ket to begin to slow was the lower end of the mar­ket, where first-time buy­ers tend to be a bit more active,” he says. “It then started to slow in the $400,000-to-$600,000 price range, the next step up. That range has kind of flat­tened out in terms of sales, whereas it was one of the strongest areas of the mar­ket in recent years.”

    Com­ment: That is the range I would be con­cerned with, the $400–600,000 range. That is the meat of the Toronto real estate market.

    But “even though we’ve seen first-time buy­ing reduced, it doesn’t mean that first-time buy­ers have been inac­tive,” Mr. Hilde­brand says. Yes, many poten­tial buy­ers are instead rent­ing. But some are choos­ing to read­just their expec­ta­tions and live in cheaper loca­tions or smaller houses. For instance, more afford­able areas in and around Toronto, such as Scar­bor­ough and Ajax, are attract­ing a larger share of buyers.

    Com­ment: The 905 did see a bump in sales. For $500,000 you can get a 3,500sf 4-bedroom palace in Ajax. Or, a run down semi with 1 wash­room and a damp base­ment – no park­ing – in Leslieville.

    And with inter­est rates remain­ing low for a long period of time, it’s quite pos­si­ble the hous­ing mar­ket could regain strength once again. Experts such as CIBC World Mar­kets econ­o­mist Ben­jamin Tal are argu­ing that the spring sea­son is likely to be stronger than expected.

    Mar­ket activ­ity over the past two or three weeks seems to have been pick­ing up quite nicely,” says Andrew Charles, CEO of Canada Guar­anty Mort­gage Insur­ance Co. “It hasn’t shown up in the Feb­ru­ary num­bers, but I think you’re going to see it in the March numbers.”

    Com­ment: I sure hope so! I have been pre­dict­ing it and I hate to be wrong. Prob­a­bly on the 18th we will have mid-March num­bers… I am actu­ally anx­ious about the data, which never hap­pens. This is a turn­ing point, up or down from here.

    Large mar­ket­ing cam­paigns and incen­tives on the part of mort­gage lenders are likely to play a sig­nif­i­cant role in dri­ving the mar­ket this spring. “PEOPLE BUY PAYMENTS, THEY DON’T BUY HOUSE PRICES,” says Toronto-based mort­gage plan­ner Calum Ross. “There is a huge psy­cho­log­i­cal impact of five-year mort­gage rates drop­ping below 3%.” Mr. Ross adds that he’s now see­ing “mas­sive” amounts of mar­ket­ing by mort­gage lenders.

    Mr. Charles at Canada Guar­anty says he is now see­ing more appli­ca­tions for mort­gage insur­ance from buy­ers with a down pay­ment of less than 20%, sug­gest­ing the start of an uptick among first-time buyers.

    David Resnick, who deals with finan­cial insti­tu­tions for Google Canada, said the num­ber of searches for the word “mort­gage” jumped by 50% after Bank of Mon­treal cut the adver­tised price of its five-year fixed-rate mort­gage from 3.09% to 2.99%. “That’s huge,” he said. “And home insur­ance searches spiked more than 80% in the 24 hours fol­low­ing the announce­ment, sug­gest­ing that peo­ple are look­ing at actual purchases.”

    Phil Soper, CEO of real estate agency Royal LeP­age, said the slow­down is a good thing, because the mar­ket was too hot, but he thinks that the changes that Mr. Fla­herty made in July went too far. “It pushed things for young peo­ple, for first-time buy­ers, to a place it didn’t need to be,” he said.

    Now, he says, the impact of the change has largely been felt. “Young peo­ple have had eight months to either save up a larger down pay­ment or look far­ther afield for a home,” he says. “As long as the cost of mort­gage financ­ing remains very low, we’re going to attract finan­cially sta­ble young peo­ple, first-time buy­ers, into the hous­ing mar­ket. The desire to own one’s home hasn’t changed one bit.”

    Com­ment: We really have to wait until 12 months have passed since the rule changes. That will really tell the tale. In the end, things have slowed down – which is good. They are unlikely to drop furter. Sales will sta­bi­lize, prices will slow to increases in the 1–3% range. Mort­gage rates will stay in the 3% range. Nor­mal, basi­cally, less crazy.

    TORONTO: EXPENSIVE, WITH EVEN RENTAL PRICES MOVING UP

    Prospec­tive Toronto first-time buy­ers Mr. Padley and Ms. McGov­ern are com­ing to terms with the fact that the house they want prob­a­bly isn’t the house they can afford.

    Com­ment: No, buy­ers will never come to grips with what they want ver­sus what they can afford.

    A semi-detached would be ideal, but for our price range it’s going to have to be a town­home and it’s going to have to be out­side of the area that we want to live in,” says Mr. Padley, 31.

    Mr. Padley works in soft­ware devel­op­ment and his wife in pen­sion admin­is­tra­tion, and the cou­ple has man­aged to save up a 20% down pay­ment. They want to spend no more than $350,000 to $400,000, but their bank preap­proved them for a mort­gage of about $900,000. “It’s ridiculous.”

    Com­ment: No, it is sim­ply what you can afford if you spent every penny on hous­ing. They must make around $150,000 com­bined with some $100,000 to put down. They are exactly what the banks want. If they spent $900,000 they would be on the hook for a pay­ment of around $3,800 a month – 30% of their gross monthly income if I am right about their pay. Com­pletely and totally within all pru­dent guide­lines for mort­gage lend­ing. But I under­stand want­ing to keep pay­ments at $1,500 as they would be with a $400,000 pur­chase. Trust me, I spent a lot less than the bank would have given me. And I am quite happy not eat­ing Kraft Din­ner every night!

    The cou­ple cur­rently expect that they will remain renters for much or all of the year. They looked into rent­ing a larger place, one big enough to start a fam­ily in, but balked at the costs of those as well.

    Com­ment: Well there isn’t much you can do if you are just cheap. Hous­ing costs are high, sim­ple as that. Rent or buy, both are expen­sive. I am show­ing lit­tle shoe­box con­dos in the 550sf range for $1,650 a month. If you get into a 2-bedroom, you really are bet­ter off buying.

    Such are the chal­lenges of many young prospec­tive first-time buy­ers in the country’s most pop­u­lated city. Home prices in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) rose by 6% in just the first six months of 2012, reduc­ing afford­abil­ity, said Shaun Hilde­brand, senior mar­ket ana­lyst in Ontario at Canada Mort­gage and Hous­ing Corp. They then nudged down about 2% dur­ing the fall, and have since essen­tially stabilized.

    Com­ment: Prices always rise in the spring, then drop in the sum­mer, rise again in fall and drop again in win­ter. Hap­pens. Every. Year.

    Given the high prices, many peo­ple are choos­ing to rent. Rental vacan­cies are at one of the low­est lev­els of the past decade and rent lev­els are rising.

    Com­ment: Vacancy rates are now under 1%. Crazy… bid­ding wars for shoe­box condo rentals…

    What’s been com­mon is that an owner will list their prop­erty for both sale and rent at the same time, and then what­ever is most appeal­ing, they’ll go with that,” Mr. Hilde­brand says.

    Sales over the Mul­ti­ple List­ing Ser­vice in Feb­ru­ary fell 15% in the GTA. Sales of con­dos in the down­town region cov­ered by the 416 area code dropped 20%, with prices falling 4.7% from a year ago to $352,614 on aver­age. Sales of detached homes in that same down­town area fell 17%, while the aver­age price held roughly flat, ris­ing 0.1% to $823,329.

    Com­ment: Sure, but the over­all aver­age price rose 2%, which you fail to mention.

    But the Toronto Real Estate Board is still fore­cast­ing that the aver­age price for all types of homes in the GTA will rise from its cur­rent $510,580 to $515,000 dur­ing the year. That’s a phe­nom­e­non that’s helped in part, the home-building indus­try says, by the restric­tion of the sup­ply of detached homes cre­ated by reg­u­la­tions and land con­straints includ­ing the greenbelt.

    Com­ment: That is less than 1%, I think that is low. I think we will see some­thing closer to 2%, to $520,000. Not that that is a very big dif­fer­ence, I know.

    And a num­ber of observers spec­u­late that the mar­ket is already begin­ning to bounce back from the softening.

    We’ve seen sales lev­els slow down since the sum­mer, but since Jan­u­ary, Feb­ru­ary, we’ve actu­ally seen the monthly trend begin to sta­bi­lize,” Mr. Hilde­brand says. “When you look at things on a monthly basis, you start to see a bit of momen­tum actu­ally being added back into the market.”

    Condo devel­op­ers are lur­ing buy­ers into build­ings that are about to undergo con­struc­tion with incen­tives such as lower down pay­ment require­ments, free ini­tial main­te­nance fees, or even guar­an­tee­ing that they’ll find a ten­ant to rent the unit – or else pay the rental costs – for the first two years.

    Despite that, Oliver Baumeis­ter von Bret­ten, a bro­ker with Re/Max who spe­cial­izes in Toronto con­dos, has yet to see a sig­nif­i­cant resur­gence among first-time buy­ers in the lower end of the mar­ket. “They’re com­ing back, but very cau­tiously,” he says. “I had a guy ready to buy in Queen West and then he said, ‘with the condo bub­ble com­ing I think I’ve got to rent for another year,’ ” adding that this seg­ment of the mar­ket appears to be more highly influ­enced by com­ments from pol­icy mak­ers and economists.

    Com­ment: Condo bub­ble? Seri­ously… And once the year passes, he will say the same thing. Prices will be no lower a year from now. And he will keep doing that, putting off buy­ing because of his per­ceived “bub­ble”. Five years from now, the $300,000 condo he had his eye on will now be $330,000 and mort­gage rates will have risen to 4.09%. He will not be able to buy that condo any­more, as it will cost too much. That is with mort­gage rates ris­ing only 0.33% per year and prices ris­ing only 2% per year. Hardly a bub­ble… but cer­tainly the enemy of waiting.

    —————————————————————————————————–
    Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

    Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
    who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    —————————————————————————————————–


    Incom­ing search terms
  • susan pigg fallingbrook
  • when does the spring sell­ing sea­son start toronto
  • Housing market headed for soft landing, agency, CEOs say

    Tara Perkins & Grant Robert­son – The Globe and Mail

    While the drop in Cana­dian house sales that began in the sec­ond half of 2012 is likely to con­tinue, the mar­ket is headed for a soft land­ing rather than a crash, one of the country’s largest real estate agen­cies and a num­ber of bank CEOs pre­dicted Tuesday.

    Their com­ments came as the lat­est data sug­gest that the steep drop in year-over-year home sales per­sisted through to the end of the year.

    Com­ment: Be inter­est­ing to see how they change their tune now that things have reversed and are ris­ing again…

    The num­ber of exist­ing homes sold fell by an aver­age of 18.6% year-over-year using a sam­ple that includes Van­cou­ver, Toronto, Ottawa, Cal­gary, Edmon­ton, Kitch­ener, the Fraser Val­ley, Vic­to­ria, Saska­toon and Regina, accord­ing to a com­pos­ite num­ber com­piled by Bloomberg,” econ­o­mists at Bank of Nova Sco­tia wrote in a research note. The data, they added, are “not pretty.”

    But high-profile voices in the bank­ing and real estate sec­tors sug­gested that the impact of the sales down­turn will not be severe.

    Our expec­ta­tion is we’ve got this sort of soft-landing sce­nario on the real estate side,” Royal Bank of Canada CEO Gord Nixon told investors at a con­fer­ence in Toronto on Tues­day. “We have seen a slow­down in sales and we’ve cer­tainly seen a slow­down in mort­gage demand, but price lev­els are rel­a­tively stable.”

    Com­ment: If not still ris­ing, albeit slowly.

    Speak­ing at the same con­fer­ence, Bank of Mon­treal CEO Bill Downe said that a drop in house prices is to be expected. “House prices may just stag­nate for a cou­ple of years, and that’s the def­i­n­i­tion of a soft land­ing,” he said.

    Com­ment: And flat prices are a far cry from the stu­pid 25% drop pre­dicted by some. I won­der how mid-January’s 4% price rise fig­ures into their cal­cu­la­tions – if at all.

    Real estate agency Royal LeP­age is fore­cast­ing a mild cor­rec­tion in the com­ing months. It believes that sales in the first half of the year will be slower than last year, tem­per­ing the pace at which prices have been ris­ing. But it is pre­dict­ing that by the end of 2013, the aver­age national house price will be 1% higher.

    Fewer home own­ers listed their prop­er­ties late last year as more poten­tial buy­ers moved to the side­lines, Phil Soper, CEO of Royal LeP­age, said in a press release. The slow­down in list­ings kept inven­tory lev­els lower, and sup­ported house val­ues, he said.

    Com­ment: And now that peo­ple have saved up, they will re-enter the mar­ket. This will prompt more list­ings, which will fuel higher sales vol­ume and that will push prices up.

    The real estate agency said that it saw the price of stan­dard two-storey houses rise 4% year-over-year in the fourth quar­ter, to $390,444, while the national aver­age price of con­do­mini­ums sold increased 1% to $239,374.

    Royal LeP­age expects the year-over-year declines in sales that char­ac­ter­ized the lat­ter part of 2012 to con­tinue. Sales vol­umes should improve a bit in the third quar­ter, it said, becom­ing essen­tially flat when it comes to year-over-year com­par­isons, and then show year-over-year growth in the final months of the year.

    Com­ment: First half sales will be slower, since Q1 and Q2 2012 were fairly hec­tic. But the sec­ond half of 2013 will be higher than 2012, as that part of the year slowed significantly.

    With eco­nomic fun­da­men­tals such as employ­ment lev­els improv­ing, we expect this cycli­cal cor­rec­tion to be short-lived,” Mr. Soper said.

    Sal Guatieri, senior econ­o­mist at BMO Nes­bitt Burns, told reporters on a con­fer­ence call Tues­day that a soft land­ing appears to be under way in most regions of the coun­try in the wake of a decade-long boom.

    We expect it to con­tinue this year, with sales and hous­ing starts mod­er­at­ing fur­ther and prices gen­er­ally sta­bi­liz­ing,” he said, adding that the mar­ket will be sup­ported by fac­tors such as mod­er­ate job growth and steady immi­gra­tion. “Most impor­tantly, demand will be sup­ported by con­tin­ued low inter­est rates with the Bank of Canada likely on hold for another year,” he said.

    On the down­side, the mar­ket will be restrained by ele­vated house­hold debt, mod­er­ately high val­u­a­tions, lit­tle pent-up demand and, most impor­tantly, tighter mort­gage rules, he added.

    Royal LeP­age is pre­dict­ing the aver­age house price in Van­cou­ver will decline by 3% this year, while most parts of the coun­try will see small price increases. Gains will be larger in Cal­gary (2.5%) and Regina (4%), it pre­dicts. It expects aver­age prices to rise by 1% in Toronto.

    —————————————————————————————————–
    Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

    Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
    who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    —————————————————————————————————–


    Incom­ing search terms
  • royal lep­age toronto bro­ker­age commision