Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Tag Archives: Canadian house prices

Housing credit squeeze likely to keep bubble at bay

By David Olive – Toronto Star

Finance Min­is­ter Jim Fla­herty has headed off any last chance of a hous­ing bub­ble devel­op­ing in Canada.

Com­ment: No one but The Star thought there was any chance of a bub­ble any­way. You just threw the words around because it made for good press. All of the data sup­ports the exact oppo­site. Look at the num­bers from 1988–1991 ver­sus 1996–2010 and notice that they are not at all alike. Peo­ple – do not believe the hype, check the data for your­self and come to your own con­clu­sions!

Not that there was much like­li­hood of a bub­ble form­ing
, despite the aston­ish­ing recov­ery in Cana­dian house prices in recent months, fuelled by pent-up demand and record-low inter­est rates. The fears on that score are overblown. So are those of a crash in prices when the non-existent bub­ble implodes.

Here’s why the Cana­dian hous­ing mar­ket is head­ing into a period of stability:

Ottawa has just sig­nalled it will slam the brakes on the real estate mar­ket if it shows signs of spin­ning out of control.

Mortgage-tightening rules Fla­herty unveiled Tues­day are gen­tle and highly tar­geted. They’re aimed at dis­cour­ag­ing Cana­di­ans from using their homes as ATM machines. And to make life dif­fi­cult for spec­u­la­tors who buy six-packs of condo units in the hope of flip­ping them for a quick buck.

That activ­ity dri­ves up hous­ing val­ues across the board, fos­ter­ing the illu­sion of a sus­tain­able rise in demand and prices that, in fact, is built on sand. These were cul­prits in the record run-up in U.S. hous­ing val­ues in the pre­vi­ous decade that ended with an epic col­lapse, as U.S. house prices abruptly plunged between 40% and 70% from their 2007 peak.

If Flaherty’s new mea­sures don’t ease house-price infla­tion, he’ll reach deeper into his tool­box for a mal­let, and now every player in the mar­ket knows it. Fla­herty said Cana­di­ans can with­draw only 90% of the value of their homes when refi­nanc­ing, down slightly from the cur­rent 95%. In the next round of dis­ci­plin­ing the mar­ket, if required, Ottawa can drop that amount to 85% or still lower.

Ottawa will now require a 20% down pay­ment on government-insured mort­gages for what it describes as “spec­u­la­tive” invest­ment properties.

Real estate agents, mort­gage bro­kers and even some econ­o­mists feared Ottawa might apply that 20% require­ment on all hous­ing pur­chases. That could dampen not only real estate val­ues, but also the wider eco­nomic recovery.

But Ottawa has bared its teeth: If the upward spi­ral in prices con­tin­ues, Fla­herty might broaden the appli­ca­tion of the higher down pay­ment require­ment to, say, prin­ci­pal residences.

The Canada Mort­gage and Hous­ing Corp., the prin­ci­pal insurer of Cana­dian home mort­gages, already has tight­ened its rules on approv­ing insur­ance on mort­gages that show the slight­est poten­tial for default. And it has elim­i­nated non-down-payment mortgages.

One of the clas­sic char­ac­ter­is­tics of a bub­ble is that in the midst of one, no one thinks it’s a bub­ble. If they did, they’d quickly clear their win­nings off the table. That fears of an emerg­ing Cana­dian hous­ing bub­ble have pre­oc­cu­pied econ­o­mists, lenders, pol­i­cy­mak­ers and buy­ers since last fall is a sure indi­ca­tion that the mar­ket is not caught up in an irra­tional buy­ing frenzy.

There has been lit­tle spec­u­la­tive activ­ity in the hous­ing mar­ket. This dan­ger­ous phe­nom­e­non shows up in vol­ume as much as prices, as the num­ber of trans­ac­tions soars with the ram­pant buy­ing of non-owner-occupied homes. Yet in this mar­ket, as prices have risen strongly, vol­ume has been close to flat.

The hous­ing mar­ket is about to endure two cold show­ers. The Har­mo­nized Sales Tax (HST) will kick in July 1 in Ontario and B.C., two of the biggest and most buoy­ant mar­kets. And the Bank of Canada’s low-low inter­est rates – the main cause of today’s robust prices – are expected to rise this year.

The fun­da­men­tals of our econ­omy don’t sup­port another leap in prices.

No ques­tion, the Cana­dian hous­ing mar­ket has recov­ered with star­tling speed and strength. From the trough a year ago last month, aver­age Cana­dian home prices have soared 23%, in the teeth of a global reces­sion with no equal in mod­ern times. The aver­age Toronto house price has jumped 19% in the past year, to $409,058 last month.

But Cana­dian per­sonal income slipped 1% in 2009, and total employ­ment was down 1.4% from 2008. And in a report Tues­day, the Ottawa-based Vanier Insti­tute of the Fam­ily warned that Cana­dian house­hold debt reached a record aver­age of $96,000 last year. The inci­dence of late mort­gage pay­ments soared 50% in 2009, and credit-card hold­ers at least three months behind in their pay­ments was up 40%.

Under those cir­cum­stances, deferred grat­i­fi­ca­tion will trump irra­tional exu­ber­ance in most dinner-table dis­cus­sions of fam­ily finances.

————————————————————————————————————

Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion  -  416−388−1960

————————————————————————————————————


Incom­ing search terms
  • flip­ping toront
  • origami lofts down payment
  • The oversold story of the Canadian recession

    Stephen Gordon on the housing market

    Stephen Gordon – National Post

    Here is part of what is hopefully one of the last of a once-robust breed – The Apocalyptic Canadian Housing Market Story, this one from Macleans:

    Judging by the latest real estate data, the Canadian housing market could scarcely be better. Average home prices are up more than 16 per cent this year, and in May they hit an all-time monthly high, according to the Canadian Real Estate Association. By those numbers, Canada didn’t just sidestep the housing market crash that continues to plague the United States, it sailed right through it virtually unscathed. And yet, there are plenty of signs that the Canadian housing market is still sitting on some very shaky ground—and even the potential that Canada’s big housing crash is yet to come.

    Yadda yadda yadda.

    We all know that the proximate cause of the U.S. recession was the bursting of its housing market bubble: it blew up banks, laid waste to personal balance sheets, and left millions of people stuck in homes whose mortgages were more than their market value.

    And then Canada went into recession. Unfortunately, this set up the following error of logic that was repeated in all-too-many Canadian newsrooms:

    1. The U.S. is in recession because its housing market blew up.

    2. Canada is in recession.

    3. Therefore, Canada’s housing market must be blowing up as well.

    And so it was the fate of any number of hapless Canadian journalists to be given assignments to bash out pieces that fit this narrative. But these exercises were all doomed to failure. The decline in house prices in Canada is a symptom of the recession, not its cause.

    Let’s look at how house prices have behaved since 2003:

    Canadian and US price indices

    Canadian and US price indices

    U.S. house prices have fallen almost 40% (all changes are expressed in per cent log terms: 100 times the difference in the logs), while Canadian house prices are still within 10% of their peak. There are any number of lazy analysts who have swallowed the faulty syllogism enumerated above and have concluded that ‘Canada is following the U.S. with a lag’. This only makes sense if you think that Canadian house prices rose for the same reasons that US prices rose, and that they have fallen for the same reasons that U.S. prices have fallen. This is not the case. As has been documented at great length here and elsewhere, the Canadian economy has avoided the worst of the bubble and its consequences for the following reasons (among others):

    1. We never had restrictions on interstate banking, so Canadian banks spread their assets and liabilities across Canada. (So it doesn’t matter if a local housing market goes bust).

    2. We don’t have Glass-Steagal. The investment banks joined the retail banks some years ago.

    3. We don’t have mortgage interest deductibility from taxes. So paying down your mortgage is a tax-free investment. So most people want to pay down their mortgages.

    4. (Except in Alberta), mortgages are fully recourse. You can’t just walk away from a negative equity home and hand the keys to the bank; the bank will come after you for the difference.

    Yes, house prices have fallen. But the linkages that make the U.S. story so compelling don’t exist here. We don’t have banks that are blowing up. We don’t have massive waves of foreclosures (even the Globe and Mail has given up on its series of articles that culminated in this silliness). Nor do we have much in the way of evidence that lower house prices are causing undue inconvenience to Canadians: when Maclean’s decided to jump on the OMGWTFBBQ housing market bandwagon, the best it could could come up with in the way of a victim was some flipper of 7-figure Vancouver condos who got caught mid-flip. Boo-hoo-freaking-hoo.

    Moreover, it’s becoming pretty clear that the decline in house prices is not so much a national story as it is one of falling house prices in Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto:

    Canadian city house price indices

    Canadian city house price indices

    Vancouver is and always will be a special case whenever we talk about housing prices in Canada: its geography makes it extremely difficult for developers to respond to increases in demand. This is the sort of environment in which bubbles flourish so I’m not going to pretend that I can predict movements in Vancouver house prices. In Calgary, the incipient recovery in the oil sector will no doubt establish a floor on housing prices there fairly soon. And there’s even not-entirely-bad news out of Toronto these days. So I don’t see just how the national index is supposed to fall by another 30% or so.

    It’s worth following the housing market numbers. But they are going to be at best a coincident indicator in this cycle.

    Stephen Gordon is a professor of economics at l’Université Laval in Quebec City, Canada and a fellow of the Centre interuniversitaire sur le risque, les politiques économiques et l’emploi. He is co-author of the blog site, Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.

    ————————————————————————————————————

    Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information  -  416-388-1960

    ————————————————————————————————————

    Housing starts post surprise jump

    Financial Post

    Home construction rose unexpectedly in March, led by Ontario and Quebec, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation said Wednesday.

    There were 154,700 housing starts on an annualized basis during the month, up from a revised 136,100 units in February, the government agency said.

    Many economists had expected housing starts to dip to 130,000 units in March.

    “Higher multiple starts in Ontario and Quebec were the main contributors to the rise in new construction activity in March,” said Bob Dugan, CMHC’s chief economist.

    “While the multiples segment experienced the largest increase, the overall boost in starts was broad based, encompassing the singles segment as well.”

    Urban housing starts were up 17% to 127,900 units in March, the agency said. Urban multiple starts rose 28.3% to 81,500 and urban single starts were 1.3% higher at 46,400.

    Construction of urban units rose by an annualized 35% in Ontario and 23.3% in Quebec. Meanwhile, urban activity fell 17.3% in British Columbia, 7.9% in Atlantic Canada and by 7.5% in the Prairies.

    Rural starts were flat at 26,800 units in March.

    “New home construction is now at a more sustainable level after having been exceptionally strong over the past seven years, exceeding 200,000 units per year,” CMHC said.

    Millan Mulraine, economics strategist at TD Securities, said the report “suggests that new housing starts activity pickup aggressively in March after six consecutive monthly declines.”

    “However, in the grand scheme of things, the key economic fundamental factors continue to point to further weakness in Canadian housing sector activity, and as such we believe that this surprising pickup in construction activity is likely to be a one-month wonder, and expect activity to soften in the coming months,” he said.

    The CMHC report comes a day after TD Economic forecast average Canadian house prices to fall to about $246,000 in 2009 – down 24% from the peak of $324,000 in 2007 – while overbuilding in the residential market, particularly in the Prairies, should prevent the sector from making a quick recovery from the current downturn in sales, prices and construction.

    Comment: Take note, those are national prices, not Toronto prices. It is not unexpected to see, as the Western Provinces are taking a nasty hit in their respective real estate markets. It was Ontario that led the increase in housing starts above, keep that in mind.

    “A glut in the housing stock means that builders will have to rein in residential construction further – particularly in the most overbuilt markets. As well, excess inventories in certain markets will prove an additional drag on home prices,” it said.

    The TD report said house prices have been overshooting their fundamental value by about 9% since 2005 as speculation drove up prices and encouraged overbuilding.

    ————————————————————————————————————

    Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960


    Incoming search terms
  • 1988 house price in canada
  • show
     
    close
    You want that dream home? Why you'll have to join the line in this thin housing market http://t.co/IRN3rvwxjE