Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Tag Archives: financial system

Flaherty to fight for mortgage market

Opposes bank tax

Paul Vieira, Financial Post

Canada stepped up its fight against overzealous bank regulation, with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty pledging to fight against new rules that could unravel the country’s unique mortgage market — one of the few to come out of the global financial crisis relatively unscathed.

Further, he has written a letter to his Group of 20 colleagues to reiterate Canada’s stern opposition to a global bank tax advocated by Britain and France and that appears to be gaining support in the United States. Instead, he threw his support behind a Canadian compromise that would be more market-oriented but ensure lenders would have access to capital in the event they run into trouble.

“We are not going o have Canadian banks disadvantaged because they performed well, and [because] we have solid system in this country — whereby systems in other countries didn’t work as well,” Mr. Flaherty told reporters yesterday.

The forceful talk from Mr. Flaherty indicates Canada plans to use its influence as a home to a well-functioning financial system in trying to shape the new global rules aimed at preventing another credit crisis that threw the global economy into a deep recession. The hardening of Canada’s opposition also reflects growing uneasiness among Canadian banks about the reforms.

Last week, two chief executives from big Canadian banks warned of changes under consideration that would alter the country’s mortgage market and encourage behaviour seen in the United States that led to the subprime crisis.

Gordon Nixon, chief executive of Royal Bank of Canada, described the provision as “absurd.”

The new standards, being developed by the so-called Basel committee, fail to take into account that insured Canadian mortgages are guaranteed by the federal government.

If adopted, Canadian banks would be forced to have the same amount of capital against their mortgages as a bank in another country operating in a riskier environment with no state backing. As a result, Canadian lenders may have to package more of their mortgages and sell them to investors, like U.S. banks did to great detriment, or issue fewer mortgages.

“This is another item we need to discuss in terms of global financial reform,” Mr. Flaherty said, adding he would be advocating for an “appropriate” calculation for capital so Canadian banks aren’t penalized.

“The Canadian mortgage situation is rather different than in the United States,” he said, in reference to how Canadian banks didn’t engage, for the most part, in the type of subprime lending that led to the U.S. housing collapse once financial conditions turned sour.

Countries that had to bail out its banks with direct cash infusions have warmed to the idea of a bank tax, to ensure governments recoup the monies used to keep their financial systems afloat. But Mr. Flaherty reiterated yesterday Ottawa’s official opposition, as first reported in February by the Financial Post.

He suggested many of the countries supporting the bank tax happen to be “running substantial deficits,” and expressed concern money raised by the bank tax might be used to pay down fiscal debt as opposed to being set aside for times of trouble.

“The principle,” he said, “is that banks that contributed to the financial crisis, they should bear the cost–not taxpayers.”

The International Monetary Fund, in a paper this week, warned that slapping a surcharge on banks could reduce lending banks conduct at a time when the global economy needs credit the most.

In his letter to his G20 peers, he asked them to consider an alternative put forth recently by Julie Dickson, Canada’s chief bank regulator, whereby financial institutions insure themselves against failure by issuing debt that can be converted into equity at times of trouble. Ms. Dickson called the scheme “embedded capital.”

“I think we are taking a leadership position on this because we are putting forward an alternative to a bank tax or levy,” Mr. Flaherty said, hinting that a number of G20 countries might side with Canada in its fight.

————————————————————————————————————–

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information  -  416-388-1960

————————————————————————————————————–

No bubble here, Home Capital chief says

Demand recovering; Mortgage lender’s profits up 39.4% over dismal 2008

John Greenwood, Financial Post

Of all the experts offering opinions on the state of the Canadian housing market, very few have as clear a view of the situation on the ground as Gerry Soloway, and as far as he’s concerned there’s no bubble.

The recent jump in prices is a reflection of a recovery in demand as buyers moved back into the real estate market after the financial crisis, according to the chief executive of Home Capital Group Inc., a leading non-prime mortgage lender based in Toronto.

“I think we have clearly come off the bottom and I think there was a lot of pent-up demand before the market turned,” Mr. Soloway said in an interview. “I see the market probably levelling off during 2010.”

Over the last few months some economists and industry players have warned that the Canadian real estate market is getting overheated and that its time for the government to tighten the rules around mortgages as a way to remove some of the froth.

Mr. Soloway said he agrees that even though there’s no bubble it would be prudent if Ottawa “took a few modest steps and tweaked the market place” by such measures as shortening the maximum amortization period to 30 years from 35 years and increasing the minimum down payment for some buyers.

Home Capital yesterday reported fourth-quarter net income of $40.5-million, up 39.4% from the same period last year when the economy was immersed in gloom. In the three months ended Dec. 31, the company originated $3.9-billion of mortgages, up nearly 40% from 2008.

Residential home loans were $1.3-billion, up 51.4%. About $1-billion of those loans were related to single family homes. Mr. Soloway said Home Capital looks to insure and securitize about half of its mortgages through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp,

In the fourth quarter it securitized $863.4-million, up from $620.6-million.

The benefit of the strategy is twofold. Not only does it provide source of inexpensive funding– without the CMHC, Home Capital would be forced to pay significantly higher commercial rates — but it reduces risk since the mortgages are effectively insured by the federal government.

Within the residential portfolio, 31% of the loans were insured either by the CMHC or others, more than double the amount last year.

It is a long-held policy of the federal government to encourage home ownership among Canadians, and most of that is carried out by the CMHC.

Under the crown corporation’s Canada mortgage security program, banks and other lenders such as Home Capital securitized more than $100-billion of home loans last year.

A further measure introduced in the depths of the crisis known as the Insured Mortgage Protection Program enabled banks to sell $125-billion of securitized mortgages directly to the CMHC as a way to boost liquidity in the financial system.

————————————————————————————————————

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information  -  416-388-1960

————————————————————————————————————

Canada’s rate hikes will be tied to the Fed

Jeremy Torobin – CTV

When the Cana­dian dol­lar topped 95 cents (U.S.) last week, approach­ing a three-week high toward the end of a year that has seen the cur­rency gain 16% against the U.S. dol­lar, it deftly illus­trated the biggest influ­ence on what will be Mark Carney’s most cru­cial deci­sion of 2010.

As econ­o­mists and investors debate with increas­ing vigour about when the Bank of Canada will raise inter­est rates from their cur­rent rock-bottom level, the effect such a move could have on the loonie may mean bor­row­ing costs have to stay where they are well into the recov­ery. The cen­tral bank chief pledged last April to keep his main inter­est rate at the record-low level of 0.25% until at least June, 2010, in order to stim­u­late enough bor­row­ing and spend­ing to solid­ify the economy’s recov­ery. The result­ing ultra-cheap mort­gages spurred a buy­ing spree in hous­ing, and by the fall, Mr. Car­ney was stick-handling around end­less talk – from just about any­where other than the cen­tral bank – of a poten­tial asset bub­ble in res­i­den­tial real estate.

While say­ing the white-hot mar­ket was a result of pent-up demand from Cana­di­ans who had put off pur­chases dur­ing the worst days of the reces­sion, Mr. Car­ney fin­ished the year warn­ing peo­ple to avoid tak­ing on more debt than they would be able to han­dle when inter­est rates go up again, as they inevitably will.

Finance Min­is­ter Jim Fla­herty, albeit indi­rectly, poured some cold water on the notion that Mr. Car­ney would raise bor­row­ing costs before mid-2010 to cool the hous­ing mar­ket; in inter­views last week, Mr. Fla­herty noted he is pre­pared to take steps of his own if nec­es­sary, such as increas­ing the min­i­mum down pay­ment on a home and short­en­ing the max­i­mum length of mortgages.

But even as the cen­tral bank char­ac­ter­ized its con­cerns about Cana­di­ans’ debt loads as a low risk to spread through the finan­cial sys­tem, Mr. Car­ney empha­sized through­out Decem­ber that his com­mit­ment to wait until next June before tight­en­ing mon­e­tary pol­icy was very much con­di­tional on the out­look for the bank’s 2% infla­tion target.

I’m not wor­ried that we’re in a box, because if things change we would change pol­icy as appro­pri­ate,” Mr. Car­ney told BNN in a year-end tele­vi­sion inter­view that aired Dec. 17. “We have the flex­i­bil­ity to adjust it, either by short­en­ing or length­en­ing [the wait­ing period], if that’s what’s nec­es­sary to achieve our man­date.” And that’s where the loonie comes in.

To keep the hous­ing sec­tor in check, Mr. Car­ney can do lit­tle more than man­age expec­ta­tions for a rate hike that will come even­tu­ally, at a time of his choos­ing. That’s in part because infla­tion is still below the bank’s target.

It’s also because with bor­row­ing costs so low in most of the world’s major economies, rais­ing inter­est rates would make Canada a more attrac­tive place for inter­na­tional investors seek­ing higher yields, which could send the Cana­dian dol­lar soar­ing. That would fur­ther com­pli­cat­ing life for exporters try­ing to regain a foot­ing in global mar­kets that are still smart­ing from the downturn.

Given the remark­able homo­gene­ity of mon­e­tary pol­icy around the world, you really do risk being that tall poppy and get­ting hit quite hard by the cur­rency,” said Eric Las­celles, a strate­gist at TD Secu­ri­ties in Toronto. Mr. Las­celles pointed to the recent exam­ple of Aus­tralia, another commodity-based econ­omy, where the cur­rency soared against the U.S. dol­lar after that country’s cen­tral bank became the first in the Group of 20 nations to raise inter­est rates in early October.

Last Thurs­day, the Cana­dian dol­lar appre­ci­ated 0.8% in part because investors had started to become more con­vinced the cen­tral bank was merely con­sid­er­ing a rate hike before mid-2010 or, at the very least, before the U.S. Fed­eral Reserve, which many investors see keep­ing rates near zero into 2011. That has helped the loonie out­per­form its major coun­ter­parts this month.

The Bank of Canada, which will update its fore­casts dur­ing the week of Jan. 18, cur­rently main­tains it could even take until the third quar­ter of 2011 for infla­tion to return to 2% and for the econ­omy to be run­ning at full tilt, largely because of the currency’s drag on sales of Cana­dian goods abroad.

Some ana­lysts are paint­ing Mr. Carney’s assess­ment as too cautious.

Both growth and infla­tion risks lie north of the Bank of Canada’s cur­rent fore­casts,” Yilin Nie and David Cho, strate­gists at Mor­gan Stan­ley in New York, wrote in a recent research report. “We believe the bank will need to hike before its con­di­tional com­mit­ment to keep rates low until June, 2010, and before the Fed. Our fore­casts show the first Bank of Canada rate hike in April, 2010.”

Most Cana­dian econ­o­mists, mean­while, remain in wait-and-see mode.

Michael Gre­gory of BMO Nes­bitt Burns in Toronto wrote in a Dec. 18 note to investors that he sees “increas­ing risk that the pol­icy rate renor­mal­iza­tion process will kick off soon after Canada Day, with a small but not small-enough-to-ignore pos­si­bil­ity that the first action could occur even earlier.”

At the oppo­site extreme, how­ever, are those who believe Mr. Car­ney will wait until late next year, or even later, to tighten – not least because the effect on the cur­rency could be too severe should the Bank of Canada’s bench­mark rate be lower than the Fed’s for more than a few months.

The Bank of Canada will think very, very hard before rais­ing inter­est rates ahead of the Fed,” said Ben­jamin Tal, a senior econ­o­mist at CIBC World Mar­kets in Toronto, who pre­dicts a slow U.S. recov­ery will keep the Fed on hold and force Mr. Car­ney to wait until the first quar­ter of 2011, when the rate will jump to 1%. “To an extent, not fully but to an extent, mon­e­tary pol­icy in Canada is being highly influ­enced by devel­op­ments in Washington.”

Mr. Las­celles of TD Secu­ri­ties said the Fed won’t aban­don its unprece­dented stim­u­lus until early 2011, with the Bank of Canada there­fore wait­ing until the fourth quar­ter of 2010, even though Canada’s econ­omy is poised to heal more quickly than that of the United States. The bank “can and prob­a­bly should hike rates before the Fed because of stronger fun­da­men­tals, but it really is quite restricted in terms of how much sooner it can go.”

While the image of the cen­tral bank being held cap­tive to the Fed might bring shud­ders to Cana­dian nation­al­ists, Mar­tin Coiteux, an econ­o­mist and pro­fes­sor of inter­na­tional busi­ness at HEC Mon­treal who has tracked mon­e­tary pol­icy in both coun­tries, said the notion is overblown.

First, the effect on the cur­rency of the dif­fer­ence between Cana­dian and U.S. bor­row­ing costs are, his­tor­i­cally, just a few months, he said. And even as Mr. Car­ney wor­ries about hurt­ing exporters any more than they’ve already been hurt, if the domes­tic spend­ing he has stoked in the hous­ing sec­tor catches on enough to raise prices through­out the econ­omy, he’ll have no choice but to raise rates, regard­less of the Fed.

[The Bank of Canada’s] main objec­tive is to keep infla­tion between 1 and 3% per year, with the tar­get being at 2%,” Mr. Coiteux said. “We might be going up very grad­u­ally toward 2%, but as we move there, in order to keep their cred­i­bil­ity, they’ll have to move, too.”

————————————————————————————————————

Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion  -  416−388−1960

————————————————————————————————————

show
 
close
You want that dream home? Why you'll have to join the line in this thin housing market http://t.co/IRN3rvwxjE