Tag Archives: monetary policy
Why the housing market won’t crash in 2013
Larry MacDonald – Globe and Mail
The 12-month change in the Teranet-National Bank House Price Index has decelerated in recent months to 3.4%, led by declines in Vancouver (-1.4%) and Victoria (-1.7%). Some people interpret this weakness as a sign that a housing crash has started – see, for example, the Canadian Business article “Canada’s housing crash begins.” I don’t see a collapse in 2013 for several reasons. One is the highly supportive monetary environment.
Comment: And how anyone can turn a 1.4% decline into a crash, I have no idea. The spin is alive and well in the media… Heck, in Toronto we have a 4% sales volume decline coupled with a 7% price increase being touted as the beginning of the collapse. Yeah, I know, right?
In the case of the U.S. housing boom from 2003 to 2007, the overvaluation was pricked after the Federal Reserve dramatically tightened monetary policy to cool off an overheated economy. This catalyst is absent in Canada as 2013 commences.
Indeed, monetary policies in Canada, the U.S., Japan, China and elsewhere around the world are dialed to the opposite extreme. They are hyper-expansionary, with interest rates at record lows and printing presses running like never before.
Comment: I am not sure Canada is printing money, but the US is making the stuff like crazy.
This means that Canada and other countries should continue generating growth in jobs and income. Since higher employment and income typically support housing markets, prices are not likely to fall much in 2013. Or if they do, they shouldn’t stay down for long.
Comment: And if interest rates do rise, it will only be a sign of a strong economy, meaning people have good jobs and money. Which is always good.
The crash crowd says Canadian houses are overvalued on the basis of the price-to-income ratio. So they fear the process of mean reversion will take prices down by 25% or more. But with so much monetary stimulus in the system, the price-to-income ratio should also be normalized by income increases.
Comment: But the price-to-income model is flawed. The current average Toronto housing price of $497,298 costs $1,899.52 to service at today’s mortgage rate of 2.99% with 20% down. Go back 30 years to 1982 when mortgage rates hit 19.41% and house prices were $95,496 and you have a monthly mortgage payment of $1,212.22 – in 1982 dollars. Adjust for inflation and that mortgage would cost $2,610.77 in 2012 dollars. So housing is actually a lot more affordable now that it was 30 years ago. So the whole price-to-income ratio is moot. What matters is monthy mortgage-to-income, which has fallen. But the doomsayers do not want you to know this! People buy houses based on what it costs every month to pay the bill, that is where their purchase price comes from. Same with cars, that is why Honda advertises the monthly cost, not the sticker price.
Interest rates may begin edging up later in 2013. They shouldn’t threaten the housing market because income and employment will be climbing as well, creating offsetting demand for housing. Similarly, the one-off impact of a tightening in mortgage rules during 2012 should not be cause for a serious setback.
Comment: The new mortgage rules only serve to strengthen the market, weeding out those that were close to the edge.
There are other reasons for expecting a crash to be a no-show in 2013. Suffice it to say that the monetary cycle suggests a soft-landing scenario. This is not to deny there are pockets of extreme overvaluation or oversupply, where the risk of substantial correction remains. Cases in point could be Vancouver housing and Toronto condos.
Comment: Toronto condos will cool off, but they will not crash. Maybe some small prices drops, but mainly a flattening. There is no over supply, not when every new project sells 80–90% of their units before a crane goes not. Not when the vacancy rate for rentals is barely above 1%. The demand is there, trust me, if anything the supply is not enough!
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416−388−1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–
Incoming search terms
Higher than expected home prices renew concerns of Canadian bubble
Gordon Isfeld – Financial Post
As home prices continue their steady ascent, the volume of debate over the too-hot or just-about-right market is also getting turned up.
Politicians and monetary policy-makers are warning consumers to tackle their debt loads now, while many analysts argue that is already happening and house prices are still in a healthy range.
Comment: It is happening, there is proof. Canadians, as a whole, are taking on less debt and are paying down what they have. Couple that with rising incomes and our debt-to-income ratio is falling. Just what the finance minister ordered!
Few are suggesting a market crash is imminent, but this week’s spate of strong housing data has renewed concerns the market is dangerously close to overheating and heading for a bubble.
The latest salvo came Thursday, with Statistics Canada data showing new home prices climbing 0.3% in March — the 12th monthly increase in row — and just above forecasts. When compared to 12 months earlier, prices were up 2.6%.
Comment: Wow, that rate of increase is actually 0.65% less than the long-term inflation rate. And exactly the same as the current inflation rate. That means prices have actually not risen at all.
The biggest gains in March were in the Toronto and Oshawa region, where prices were up 0.6% in March — due to favourable market conditions and increased demand — and 6.2% higher on the year.
On Monday, StatsCan reported housing-permit values rose 4.7% in March, way above expectations, and following a 7.6% increase the previous month. But it was Tuesday’s closely monitored new home construction report that really got tongues wagging.
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. said housing starts jumped 14% in April from the month before to 244,900 units. Most of that activity was once again in the frenzied condo sector.
Comment: And the warmer than usual weather would not have anything to do with that, would it? Not that builders could get a head start and begin more projects sooner because the weather allowed them to. Naw, more likely just another sign of the real estate apocalypse.
That report “led to more than a few gasps and coffee stains upon release, highlighting just how high the heat has turned up in certain markets,” said BMO Capital Markets economist Alex Koustas.
“That being said, the new home price index has been relatively well-behaved, reflecting more balance on a national level.”
Comment: So really, if we don’t twist the numbers, things are overall just fine. Uh huh.
Yet, some market watchers believe home prices are overvalued by as much as 15%, while others see the gains as moderate.
Comment: No one has any basis for their “overvalued” numbers. Why 15%? Why not 22%? Or even 8.2% The market is what the market is – free and open. Prices are set by 100s of 1,000s of buyers and sellers and realtors every year. There were 456,749 sales across Canada in 2011. With one buyer and one seller, each with their own Realtor, there were 1,826,996 people involved in the national real estate market last year. Almost 2 million independent opinions on what properties are worth. Thus, house prices are exactly where they should be, at market value.
“The [market] is still healthy,” said Laura Parsons, mortgage specialist at Bank of Montreal.
“Vancouver’s market is so much different than most of other markets, and [in] Toronto … new housing prices are up substantially but it’s because of a lot on condo development — and affordable condos.”
Comment: What? New housing costs are not up. In fact, new condos fell by 1% per square foot in Q1.
As for household debt, Ms. Parsons said: “I’ve never seen so much discussion around trying to save on costs and paying more attention to their debt load.
Comment: And it is working. People are reducing their debt load. Good news, end of story.
“I think if we really had to cut back on our budget every month to afford a mortgage, I think there’s room there.”
The Bank of Canada, which has kept its trendsetting interest rate at a near-record low of 1% since September 2010, says household debt remains the biggest threat to the domestic economy.
Household debt-to-disposable income is running at about 152.9%.
Along with Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, central bank governor Mark Carney has urged consumers not to get in over their heads because rates will eventually start going up.
Last month, Mr. Carney told the House of Commons finance committee that the average home price in Canada is now about 4.75 times people’s income, while the historic average is around to 3.5 times income. He cautioned Canadians to use “prudence and caution” with their family budgets.
Comment: Yet again, that ratio is flawed. People buy a house based on the monthly cost, not the purchase price. Without getting into the details, the average house in 1982 at the current mortgage rate would have cost around $7,100 in today’s dollars. The same average house at today’s rates is around $2,800 a month. That is the ratio that matters.
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–

















