Tag Archives: Office of Energy Efficiency
By Michael Buzzelli – rabble.ca
Canadians know that our built environment — homes, offices, factories, roads and infrastructure — holds the key to an environmentally sustainable and healthy future. The energy and environmental demands of the built environment will undergo substantial changes in the years ahead. Several pressures exist: looming carbon cap and trade legislation, shrinking energy resources and, perhaps most importantly, evolving attitudes toward our consumption and production patterns.
One-third of Canada’s energy use goes to running our homes, offices and other buildings. The federal government’s Office of Energy Efficiency reports that a corresponding one-third of our current greenhouse gas emissions come from the built environment. This is a large proportion that can be addressed in both the short and long term by modifying how we build and how we use our homes and offices.
Green building and development (GBD) faces a classic policy paradox: we collectively agree that improvements are needed in the built environment but we are caught in a whirlwind of information and debate about how to move forward.
We are motivated by widespread adoption of green ideals but stymied by issues related to implementation. There is confusion over whether a technological or behavioural approach should be prioritized. “Greenwashing” (the overuse of “eco” and “green” labeling and branding, particularly where there are no environmental benefits) also adds a layer of doubt over green building benefits. And, depending on the region, over 10 green building standards — such as LEED or R-2000 — currently exist in Canada. How do builders choose among them in bringing new homes to the market? Which standard(s) should serve as the model in retrofitting houses and buildings? How do consumers choose?
A range of stakeholders are implicated in the questions asked here. Municipalities are closest to the construction and design process given their front-line role in issuing permits and approvals. Builders and developers, from which the leaders and risk-takers will emerge, provide the built environments that we occupy and use. And of course consumers, whether the household or the office building tenants, will also be concerned with the built environments that they occupy.
Given the range of technical complexity (innovation), the economic costs and potential risks involved, and the range of stakeholders, how can we move the GBD agenda forward? How do we encourage GBD risk-takers and early leaders while at the same time protecting the public interest?
Canadian Policy Research Networks recently released a report, Green Building and Development as a Public Good, which documents the range of options for implementing GBD, and concludes that collaborative governance structures in particular are critical for advancing GBD effectively and efficiently.
The report also suggests that there is no single approach or fixed set of “solutions” to the provision of green built environments. We need locally sensitive means of building green rather than uniform regulation or a mandated system that may negate or disregard region-specific issues.
GBD involves multiple stakeholders because it is new, complex and involves risk. Risk-spreading may be necessary for new and bold developments that achieve the greatest rewards. We are at the beginning of the GBD “product life cycle,” and risk-takers and leaders should be encouraged while, at the same time, safeguarding the public interest.
Industry champions will emerge but will find little incentive to take the lead or remain out front if GBD plans are consistently forestalled and if they can revert back to standard building methods, materials and products.
Since consumer demand is key, home owners also need to understand the clear benefits, including return on their investments. For example, according to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, property values rise on average by $20 for every $1 of utility savings.
Specifically, governance structures involving co-operative and collaborative approaches will need to be developed so that our communities can adapt to delivering alternative kinds of built environments. A policy development framework is needed, providing a balance between higher-level guidance, knowledge sharing and codevelopment, and the municipal scale of administration and action.
A GBD strategy must be regionally relevant and harness many of the initiatives already under way, and at the leading edge, in the region. The region needs to devise a method for promoting, but not punishing, risk-taking. Leadership is key and it should also be fostered within and across organizations.
Local areas must work to develop their governance structures to encourage and put into (best) practice GBD strategies and methods. Cities, builders, consumer groups and others will have to work through the as yet unseen plans, challenges and opportunities in delivering environmentally and energy-sustainable built environments.
Municipalities — particularly those new to GBD — will find the first steps the most prohibitive. While local areas will have their own particular circumstances and opportunities, relevant lessons from other jurisdictions may be lost if we do not think of mechanisms for ongoing, consistent and informed exchange. The wider community of municipalities and higher levels of government can and should nurture the process. Higher-order knowledge development and transfer is therefore equally important.
GBD should be viewed holistically; should capitalize on existing regulation while also developing incentives and should build on existing strengths and best practices. We also need the right measurements developed in order to monitor progress and assess outcomes.
The path to greener built environments is barely marked and obstacles remain. A significant part of the story will pivot on the local and collaborative efforts that will at first develop slowly and then be taken for granted as the new “normal.”
One might say that the future inevitably will be green, though how quickly we get there will depend on how we plan for it now.
Michael Buzzelli is Director of Housing and Environment at Canadian Policy Research Networks (CPRN) and Professor of Geography at the University of Western Ontario. The full report, Green Building and Development as a Public Good is available at www.cprn.org.
Mary Teresa Bitti, National Post
Karla Congson, owner of a drafty, century-old Leaside home in Toronto knew the furnace and central air needed to be updated, and figured the windows — still original — would have to be replaced. Marie Sullivan did not expect she’d be making home improvements to her six-year-old Upper Beaches home, but “my house was so cold all the time and some windows already had condensation.”
Before going forward, both women decided to take advantage of NRCan’s (NRC) ecoENERGY Retrofit-Homes initiative and its accompanying financial incentives. The goal of the program is to help homeowners improve energy efficiency and, in the process, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve the comfort of their homes while spending less on heating and cooling.
To take advantage of the program, homeowners must first receive a pre-retrofit evaluation of their home by an energy advisor certified by NRC. The advisor will conduct an evaluation on the entire home, basement to attic, conduct a blower door test to find air leaks and generate a report indicating which energy upgrades would yield savings. The energy audit will take between two and three hours.
“They will look at insulation levels, quality of windows and doors, heating systems for space or hot water, for example,” says Suzanne Deschénes, acting deputy director operations, housing division, Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources Canada.
“The homeowner then has up to 18 months to undertake as many retrofits as they are interested in performing. They get a second assessment after the work has been done, at which time the paperwork for our grant is completed and sent to NRC as well as the Province of Ontario, which will then match our incentives. It’s one-stop shopping for the homeowner. The assessor will take care of all that and the homeowner gets the cheque.”
In total, the combined pre- and post-retrofit assessments cost between $450 and $475, with the province paying up to $150 for the pre-retrofit assessment. In addition to the NRC incentives — $650 when you install an Energy Star-qualified gas furnace that has a 94% annual fuel utilization efficiency or higher and a brushless DC motor; up to $1,250 to beef up basement insulation by more than R23, for example — which are then matched by the province, the federal government’s new home improvement tax credit could result in another $1,350 in savings for improvements made before Dec. 31, 2009. Keep those receipts.
Ms. Congson is doing just that. Her energy audit revealed that her home had the equivalent of a three-foot hole and the major heat loss came from cracks around the baseboards and mouldings around the windows — not the windows themselves, as she expected.
In addition to a high-efficiency furnace, she also decided to invest in a tankless water heater and has just chosen a vendor for a solar water heating system.
The cost of her improvements is $14,000; she will get back about $6,000 in federal, provincial and municipal rebates. And she is anticipating lower energy bills and a smaller environmental footprint.
To find a list of NRC certified energy advisors, click here.
Top 5 home tips
Green$aver is a non-profit organization and one of NRCan’s certified energy advisors. It also provides draft proofing and insulation retrofits. Here are Green$aver’s top five improvements to make houses more comfortable and energy efficient:
1) Air sealing/draft proofing. Think weather stripping and caulking — this can save a lot of air leakage in your home. It is also one of the most cost-effective energy-saving measures you can implement.
2) Beef up your insulation. This does not have to involve tearing down walls. Blown in cellulose, for example, is an easier alternative.
3) Upgrade old appliance to Energy Star-qualified appliances.
4) Improve space heating with a high efficiency furnace.
5) Deal with leaky windows and doors.
Incoming search terms