Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Tag Archives: residential project

Looking up

Ryan Starr – Toronto Star

Any­one pon­der­ing the cur­rent state of Toronto’s condo mar­ket may want to take note of the rip-roaring suc­cess of Tridel’s recently launched Ten York project.

The 65-storey glass tower — which will rise from a wedge-shaped site at York and Har­bour Sts. — has been regarded as a bell­wether, a devel­op­ment whose sales per­for­mance this fall would offer an indi­ca­tion of the health of a condo mar­ket that some ana­lysts believe has become oversupplied.

Of the 600 units at Ten York released to date, 532 had been sold as of early Novem­ber. If the Toronto condo mar­ket is cool­ing, “you sure as heck wouldn’t have known that from what was hap­pen­ing at our sales office,” notes Jim Ritchie, Tridel’s senior vice pres­i­dent of sales and marketing.

Com­ment: Which is the funny part. Those in the busi­ness know that things are just fine. Those on the out­side are the ones call­ing for dis­as­ter. Who do you trust? Those who do this for a liv­ing, or those who don’t?

In all, Ten York will have 694 res­i­dences, rang­ing from 564-square-foot one-bedroom units to 3,858-square-foot three-bedroom suites. Prices start at $345,000. Occu­pancy of the project is slated for sum­mer 2017.

Tridel is devel­op­ing Ten York in part­ner­ship with Build Toronto, an inde­pen­dent and self-funding real estate and devel­op­ment cor­po­ra­tion with a man­date to max­i­mize the value of under-utilized real estate pre­vi­ously owned by the city.

The devel­op­ment is the first joint res­i­den­tial project on which Build Toronto has part­nered with a pri­vate builder.

Suites at Ten York — designed by II BY IV Design Asso­ciates — will have nine-foot ceil­ings and engineered-laminate plank flooring.

Kitchens will have gran­ite or quartz coun­ter­tops and AEG stain­less steel appli­ances. Bath­rooms come with white quartz coun­ter­tops and five-foot soaker tubs.

Suites include a stacked Energy Star front-loading washer and dryer, and will have indi­vid­ual meter­ing of elec­tric­ity, hot water and heating/cooling.

Ten York’s ameni­ties include a gym and stu­dios for spin­ning, yoga and car­dio; and an out­door pool, spa and saunas. The build­ing also will have a bil­liards room, media/games room, the­atre room, party room and pri­vate din­ing room, as well as guest suites and a concierge.

Bat­tling ‘doom and gloom’

In spite of Ten York’s impres­sive sales, head­lines pro­claim­ing a condo mar­ket down­turn have cre­ated quite a few headaches for Ritchie and his team. “Our biggest chal­lenge is con­sumer con­fi­dence,” he says.

Com­ment: No kid­ding! Like arti­cles about 30% fewer new condo sales that for­get to men­tion that there are 30% fewer new con­dos to buy. Either the press pur­pose­fully skews the data, or they just don’t dig up all the facts. It is hard to say, but wow… read the head­lines and then read the data for your­self. You can see for your­self what I mean.

Peo­ple read head­lines and they don’t really under­stand what’s going on, so they just see it as doom and gloom. The more this stuff is writ­ten about, the harder it is to con­vince some­body they should be buy­ing a condo.”

Ritchie acknowl­edges “we’ve had chal­lenges in the mar­ket­place over the past few months,” how­ever, he sug­gests that Ten York’s loca­tion and design have had a lot to do with the project’s success.

We did a tremen­dous amount of mar­ket research and test­ing our prospect data­base (which included more than 5,000 reg­is­trants), and it told us that in spite of what you might read in the papers, there were buy­ers for this in the community.

Tall build­ings in the down­town core with water views are in demand, and I think we’ve proven that.”

Design changes

Ten York gen­er­ated big buzz last fall when pre­lim­i­nary plans for the project were unveiled.

The tower design has since under­gone a num­ber of sig­nif­i­cant changes in response to feed­back from the city.

Most sig­nif­i­cantly, Ten York’s height has been reduced to 65 storeys from the orig­i­nally pro­posed 75 storeys.

The look of the build­ing has been tweaked, as well, becom­ing more tri­an­gu­lar in form to cor­re­spond bet­ter with the wedge-shaped site on which it will sit, located between the Gar­diner Express­way and the York St. off-ramp at the north­west cor­ner of Har­bour and York Sts.

(Chang­ing the design of the tower) allowed us also to push the build­ing, includ­ing the base, fur­ther to the west, which will cre­ate wider pedes­trian access along York St.,” notes Ritchie.

The tower redesign also saw the park­ing garage, orig­i­nally pro­posed to be above-grade, moved under­ground, free­ing up space in the podium. The base of the build­ing will now fea­ture a glass-enclosed lobby with 30-foot-high ceilings.

We’ve cre­ated a pretty spec­tac­u­lar lobby space,” says Ten York’s archi­tect Rudy Wall­man. “Because it’s so high and trans­par­ent, it will act as an exten­sion of the sidewalk.”

Despite the tower being knocked down from 75 storeys to 65, changes to the form of the build­ing resulted in a neg­li­gi­ble reduc­tion in the num­ber of suites, from 774 to 694.

The new build­ing design also min­i­mizes the use of bal­conies. West-facing suites will have them, as will units on the north­east and south­east cor­ners of the tower, but the north and south facades will be glass cur­tain walls.

I think that’s a huge bonus visu­ally,” Wall­man says. “We don’t have to deal with inset or pro­ject­ing bal­conies, which really give res­i­den­tial build­ings the look they have, which tends to be clut­tered if not han­dled well.

Here it’s going to be very sleek and fin­ished look­ing; more like a com­mer­cial building.”

Still an icon

Ten York is no longer in the run­ning to become one of Toronto’s tallest res­i­den­tial tow­ers, but Ritchie main­tains the 224-metre build­ing will be iconic all the same.

When you look at some of the ren­der­ings we cre­ated — we went out over the lake with a heli­copter with a steady cam and shot the core of the city, and then had the build­ing ren­dered into it so we could see what the over­all effect is — I think it looks pretty darn good at 65 floors.”

It won’t make us the tallest, but we’re right up there,” he adds. “And besides, it was never the race to be the tallest. We wanted the right solution

Details

Loca­tion: 10 York St.
Devel­op­ers: Tridel, tridel​.com, and Build Toronto, build​toronto​.ca
Archi­tect: Wall­man Archi­tects
Inte­ri­ors: II BY IV Design Asso­ciates, iibyiv​.com
Size: 65 storeys
Units: 694, one-bedroom to three-bedroom.
Prices: From $345,000
Ameni­ties: Gym, pool, party room, the­atre, guest suites

—————————————————————————————————–
Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

—————————————————————————————————–


Incom­ing search terms
  • 28 lin­den street toronto apt 1907
  • tridel jim ritchie
  • jim ritchie tridel email
  • tridel jim ritchie con­tact information
  • A Toronto condo hemmed in by heritage

    John Bent­ley Mays – Globe and Mail

    Long-time read­ers of this col­umn know how I think down­town Toronto’s new con­do­minium projects should look (and too sel­dom do): sleek (but not entirely glassy), urbane and for­mally imag­i­na­tive, and free of allu­sions to comfy, antique high styles.

    In fact, they are best with­out ref­er­ences to any kind of pre-modernist styling, includ­ing that of the Vic­to­rian and Edwar­dian fac­to­ries and ware­houses stand­ing thick on the ground in the core’s for­mer blue-collar districts.

    I don’t hate Toronto’s pro­le­tar­ian archi­tec­ture, by the way, or the rugged old low-rise and mid-rise indus­trial build­ings that have sur­vived from the past into the present – even if few are as inter­est­ing as those in, let’s say, the Dis­tillery Dis­trict. It’s good that devel­op­ers have saved many of these elderly struc­tures – or at least some of the bet­ter ones – from destruc­tion by trans­form­ing them into hand­some apart­ment and office blocks. And it’s surely not entirely bad that the city’s plan­ning and urban design bureau­cracy, by its insis­tence on “con­tex­tu­al­ism,” is con­tin­u­ing to remind local devel­op­ers and archi­tects of what their fore­run­ners got right a hun­dred years ago.

    My prob­lem with con­tex­tu­al­ism comes out of a belief that con­tem­po­rary Toronto archi­tects, while they ought to be good stu­dents of the things that have his­tor­i­cally made cities work well, should be able to design mid-rises and high-rises with­out hav­ing to worry about forc­ing their new build­ings to curt­sey to old ones. Under the city’s cur­rent plan­ning regime (and also, of course, due to the con­ser­vatism of many Toronto devel­op­ers), that’s exactly what the archi­tects of down­town res­i­den­tial stacks do worry about. The designs that result are some­times sober and seri­ous, but even the good ones usu­ally lack the high visual volt­age our inner-city neigh­bour­hoods need badly.

    For an exam­ple of the phe­nom­e­non I’m talk­ing about, take the new res­i­den­tial project known as Fab­rik Con­dos.

    Fash­ioned for Menkes Devel­op­ments by archi­tect Ralph Gian­none, a found­ing part­ner in the Toronto firm of Gian­none Pet­ri­cone Asso­ciates, in asso­ci­a­tion with Gio­vanni A. Tas­sone Archi­tects, this 16-storey, 169-unit build­ing is slated to rise near the garment-district inter­sec­tion of Spad­ina Avenue and Rich­mond Street West. The avail­able suites range in area from 424 square feet (for a stu­dio) up to 1,388 square feet (for three bed­rooms). Prices start at under $300,000.

    The Fab­rik site is located in a gritty, for­mer work­shop and ware­hous­ing patch of cen­tral Toronto that the city has tar­geted for rede­vel­op­ment since the 1990s. This encour­age­ment of property-owners to gen­trify, how­ever, has come with a pro­viso: that new con­struc­tion in the dis­trict sing in har­mony with the old brick-and-beam struc­tures round about. (It hasn’t always done so, by the way: Res­i­den­tial devel­op­ers have recently got­ten away with multi-unit designs vary­ing across the styl­is­tic spec­trum from a kind of awful baroque to Art Deco and some quite decent modernism.)

    Menkes Devel­op­ments, at least in the case of Fab­rik, has tried to hon­our the city’s archi­tec­tural inten­tions for the zone, and Mr. Gian­none has designed accord­ingly. The grid-like face of the building’s 11-storey podium, which is framed with embossed pre­cast con­crete, is a respect­ful nod to all the century-old ware­house façades in the neighbourhood.

    The futur­is­tic five-storey glass box Mr. Gian­none has dropped atop this podium might mit­i­gate the factory-like plain­ness of the base it rests on, if it were larger or the whole build­ing were taller. (The box, the archi­tect told me, is meant to ter­mi­nate the view from west­bound cars com­ing along Rich­mond Street.) And the polka-dot pat­tern­ing of the con­crete, an inter­est­ing touch that cre­ates an appear­ance of what the archi­tect calls “tough lace,” might off­set the machine-age solem­nity of the podium, if its improb­a­ble del­i­cacy and play­ful­ness were allowed to infect the form.

    As we have it, how­ever, Fab­rik is a stu­dious, unsmil­ing work that bows in all the right direc­tions, doesn’t get above itself, and cer­tainly doesn’t shout. It promises to stay nes­tled down well among the older items of garment-district archi­tec­ture that it imitates.

    I can appre­ci­ate Mr. Giannone’s ener­getic effort to bring Fab­rik into line with the his­tor­i­cal char­ac­ter of the area. It’s harder for me to appre­ci­ate the polite­ness of the outcome.

    Not every new res­i­den­tial build­ing has to make a great fuss about itself, of course. But just because Toronto’s main streets are dowdy and tired, and the downtown’s for­mer indus­trial strips are dull, devel­op­ers should take every new condo–block com­mis­sion as a fresh oppor­tu­nity to make some­thing ter­rific and freely con­tem­po­rary. I am under no illu­sion that the devel­op­ment com­mu­nity will take my sug­ges­tion seri­ously. But even now, some mem­bers of it appear to have arrived at the same con­clu­sion I’ve come to: that, in a city where the his­tor­i­cal con­text is so pedes­trian, con­tex­tu­al­ism really doesn’t make a lot of sense.

    —————————————————————————————————–
    Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion – 416−388−1960

    Lau­rin & Natalie Jef­frey are Toronto Real­tors with Cen­tury 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these arti­cles, they just repro­duce them here for peo­ple
    who are inter­ested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    —————————————————————————————————–


    Incom­ing search terms
  • condo ter­races designs
  • menkes devel­op­ments marketing
  • New developments give a nod to the future and a bow to the past

    By John Bentley Mays – The Globe and Mail

    A few days ago, I dropped by a couple of downtown Toronto residential projects that were still twinkles in their architects’ eyes when I first wrote about them a couple of years ago. Both designs — the Hudson apartment tower at the corner of King Street West and Spadina Avenue, and the Gardens at Queen, on Bathurst Street — have since put on bones and flesh, and are nearing completion. So it seemed a good time to pay a visit, just to check out how the architectural realities have lined up with what I imagined they would be.

    Designed for Great Gulf Homes by David Dow, principal in Diamond and Schmitt Architects, the Hudson stands in a district of old factories and warehouses near the bottom of Spadina. Globalization long ago swept away most of the manufacturing enterprises that gave the neighbourhood its industrial character, but workaday architecture lingers on to remind us of the past.

    As Mr. Dow explained when I wrote up the scheme in 2004, the Hudson was designed to echo its historic context — and, indeed, it does so. The flat rooflines of the Hudson’s elements (a 21-storey tower and lower buildings, all joined on the bottom storeys) reinforce the flat-topped skyline of the area, and make the compact complex seem at home among its neighbours.

    But despite all its best efforts to be polite to its surroundings, the Hudson is not really one of the blue-collar guys down on lower Spadina. It is lithe and athletic, while the warehouses tend to be chunky. The buff brick — an old Toronto standby — that Mr. Dow has deployed on the Hudson’s exterior may be a nod to ordinariness, but its use here is elegant, even chic — more GQ, in other words, than Truckers News.

    It was clear to me from the designs that the Hudson would be more refined than what’s around it. I was less certain, however, of this sophisticated building’s ability to hold its own on the noisy, busy intersection of King and Spadina. Now that the project is done, it’s clear that my hesitation was unfounded. The Hudson, as things have turned out, is a confident, handsome corner monument — not imposing itself on the streetscape, but marking an important downtown crossroads with modern grace and modest authority.

    The Gardens at Queen, by Chestnut Hill Homes, never had an intersection to live up to, so it could afford to be more playful than the Hudson. And playful it is, in the way a “historical” setting in a theme park so often is: awash in nostalgia, brimming with references to a glamorous past, but, in the end, rather bare under its decor and doodadery.

    This project of 177 units in seven 31/2-storey buildings would sweep us away from Toronto to 19th-century Paris, or so its early advertisements proposed. The Gardens, as built, sweep us (if anywhere) to Regency London: The exteriors are pale yellow stucco in the British manner, not Parisian grey limestone. Flights of steps lead to upper-storey entrances, each framed by a ponderous little porch, again in the British townhouse manner. The superficial effect — and it is superficial — is poshy and stodgy, and as jowly and bluff as an English bulldog.

    There is a durable market for this kind of historical fantasia, both downtown and in suburbia, so I expect to be seeing new specimens of it for the rest of my days on Earth. But if architects must provide such storybook pageantry, then let it be done in a spirit of faithfulness to the finest examples of the historical style. The best Regency domestic architecture, for example, is light and trim. The buildings at the Gardens at Queen are overdressed and heavy-handed, and crowned with parapets that, like the other trimmings and flounces, are ostentatious — as though we would not otherwise get the point that the project is seriously old-fashioned.

    When I talked with Clifford Korman, the architect, about his project two years ago, he said he intended it to be a “catalyst for the neighbourhood.” Whether the Gardens at Queen will energize its rundown Victorian context remains to be seen. But if it does change things, what will it change them into? More historical pastiche? Is this the kind of Toronto we want? Or is it merely the best we can hope for?

    As things stand so far, the Gardens is hardly an isolated island of antiquarian architecture in the midst of a 21st-century city. Many other contemporary residential projects around town self-consciously hark back to some style hauled up from the past. If it’s not Second Empire, then it’s bully-boy Victorian or pompous Edwardian. We will know that our city’s architectural conscience has come of age when we see more buildings done boldly in the spirit of the current age.

    ———————————————————————————

    Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information


    Incoming search terms
  • great gulf homes head staff
  • great gulf homes ad agency
  • show
     
    close