Tag Archives: residential properties
Toronto housing prices up 23% since 2008
Ashante Infantry – Toronto Star
Toronto housing prices are up 23% since 2008, according to a Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) report on residential sales trends.
The hot spots, cited for the most significant increases are: northwest and southwest Scarborough; detached, semi-detached, and town homes north of Bloor St. through the central part of the city, close to amenities and the subway; and Mimico.
Rising sale prices of residential property in Toronto are driven by a number of factors, including immigration, foreign investment, low interest rates, the attractiveness of an urban lifestyle, and shortages of both developable land and homes for sale, said the report.
And in a city experiencing unprecedented condo growth, bungalows on large lots are coveted; they are being purchased for land value alone and have increased by up to 50% since 2008 to $1 million or more in some neighbourhoods, with buyers willing to pay a premium to build the home of their dreams, says the study.
The Market Snapshot, which tracked prices over the past four years in selected municipalities, echoes the observations of the Toronto Real Estate Board, said its senior manager of market analysis, Jason Mercer.
“Since we came out of the recession, in the second half of 2009, and what initially was a housing based recovery, we’ve seen tight enough market conditions to see very strong upward pressure on home prices,” he said.
“With a little bit more supply in the market we’ve started to see more listings come on line, so that should see a bit of moderation in terms of price growth. We’re expecting the average price to continue to grow, but just at a slower pace.”
During the same Jan. 1, 2008 to Jan., 2012 period, MPAC found the average sale price for residential properties in Ontario rose by 17%.
The report underscores the continuing strength of the province’s real estate market, said Larry Hummel Chief Assessor for the Pickering-based non-profit corporation.
“The continuing strength is very positive, particularly when you look close to the border,” said Hummel. “You always expect that the trend that occurs there occurs in Canada, but we’ve reversed that situation” through prudent financing and not overbuilding.
While a sale price reflects mutual agreement in one particular transaction, an assessment, or a property’s current value, is based on the most probable sale price based on an analysis of all sales transactions from the local real estate market.
“We know in the Toronto market, by reading reports, that some people are more motivated than others,” Hummel. “Someone might have missed out on the last seven bids on a house and there may have been ten people competing in the auction; another month later, the market may have changed a little bit and there were four houses on the street available for sale; it’s not the same exact conditions and people bidding on those houses may not be nearly as motivated; or the person selling the property might be more motivated or less motivated. We analyze all of the sales prices in that local market in order to come up with the most likely or probable selling price.”
Toronto’s gains were the second-highest in the GTA: behind York Region’s 28%, but ahead of Halton-Peel (22%) and Durham (12%).
Northern Ontario shows the biggest growth across the province with Timmins leading at 29%, followed by Thunder Bay (26%) and Sault St. Marie (25%).
“What’s driving that is the increase in commodity prices and infrastructure to support the mining industry,” said Hummel.
In September MPAC will begin mailing out Property Assessment Notices for Ontario’s nearly five million properties with the assessed market value as of Jan. 1, 2012. Municipalities use the assessments, based on analysis of actual sale prices of similar properties, to calculate property taxes.
“Property owners should remember than an increase in assessment does not necessarily mean an increase in property taxes,” said Hummel. “It all depends on a number of factors including the amount of revenue required by your municipality or taxing authority to deliver services.
“If the assessed value of your home has increased more than the average for your local community, region and province, you may pay proportionately more in property taxes. If your home has increased in value less than the average, then you may pay proportionately less in property taxes.”
To help provide an additional level of property tax stability and predictability, the Ontario Government has introduced a phase-in program where market increases in assessed value between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2012 will be phased in over four years (2013-2016). The full benefit of a decrease is applied immediately.
Hummel said Market Snapshot was developed as part of MPAC’s commitment to openness by sharing information about how assessed values are calculated with property taxpayers.
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–
Incoming search terms
Does HST Apply To A Seller Of A Condo Assignment?
Stephen H. Shub Professional Corporation
Barrister, Solicitor, Notary
www.home-legal-cost.com
Inevitably, an offer to purchase an assignment property (often on an OREA form 140 or 141) by a buyer’s sales representative will state that, if applicable, HST is included in the purchase price (as we typically see in any offer to buy resale residential properties). The sales representative who represents a seller of an assignment (and who is advising the seller) MUST be aware that according to the Canada Revenue Agency, there are sometimes situations where HST will, in fact, be applicable and payable by the assignor/seller who is assigning a contract to buy a newly constructed unit/residence.
When applicable, HST will be payable by the Assignor (buyer #1 from the builder) on the portion of the assignment sale price related to the return of deposits (paid to the builder by the assignor/seller) PLUS the gross profit (the difference between the builder price and the assignment price).
The confusing question is whether or not HST is, in fact, applicable to the assignment and, since realtors should not undertake the responsibility to advise a seller on such a matter, MAKE SURE THAT AN ASSIGNMENT SALE WHICH STATES HST IS INCLUDED IN THE PRICE IS CONDITIONAL ON ASSIGNOR’S/SELLER’S LAWYER’S APPROVAL so that the lawyer for the assignor/seller will be responsible to advise a seller whether or not HST is applicable to the assignment/sale. The idea is to shift the burden of responsibility from the shoulders of the listing sales representative to the shoulders of the lawyer for the assignor/seller.
Believe it or not, whether or not HST is applicable to an assignment depends on the original intention/the plan (in the mind of the assignor/seller) when the offer to purchase was made with the builder. If the PRIMARY PURPOSE by the assignor/seller in buying from the builder was to profit by assigning/flipping the deal, THEN HST IS APPLICABLE to the assignment/sale.
On the other hand, if an individual originally signed an offer to purchase a condo apartment (to be newly constructed by a builder) with the primary intention that the unit bought would be used (for example) by:
(1) a son or daughter when attending University/College, OR
(2) a parent who wanted or needed a place to reside, or
(3) a spouse who planned to separate from the family, or
(4) the buyer(s) who intended to downsize, or
(5) the buyer(s) who intended to use the apartment when working downtown or when visiting Toronto
(6) a son or daughter who was engaged to be married, or
(7) buyer wanted to move closer to a workplace OR to relocate a place of work
THEN the Canada Revenue Agency would typically conclude that HST is not applicable on the assignment/sale if (at a later date) a reasonable change in circumstance resulted in an assignment/sale of the unit if, for example,
(1) such son/daughter chose not to go to University/College, or
(2) the buyer’s mom or dad no longer could use or wanted to use such apartment as a residence
(due to their death or needs a retirement home), or
(3) intention to separate from family changed, or
(4) decision was made later not to downsize, or
(5) the buyer(s) reasonably changed his/their minds about such intended use, or
(6) the engaged son or daughter decided not to marry or decided to live elsewhere, or
(7) the workplace location changed or the intended relocation of workplace changed
The question is whether the facts or circumstances would indicate to the Canada Revenue Agency that the condo was originally being acquired from the builder for the primary purpose of personal use versus buying the unit for only a potential profit with the intention of assigning or flipping the deal. If a buyer purchases two or more new condo units or has a corporation purchase a residential unit, it is more difficult (perhaps impossible) to try to explain to the Canada Revenue Agency that the primary purpose in buying from the builder was to acquire the unit for personal use as a residence for an immediate family member.
The bottom line is that a listing realtor, seeing an offer from an assignee, should encourage the assignor/seller to sign back the offer with a condition for approval of the terms of the sale by the lawyer for the assignor/seller.
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–
Incoming search terms

















