Tag Archives: storeys
New condo an example of planning process pitfalls
City building is about having a vision and sticking to it, not giving in
John Sewell – Post City
Did you hear about the development application that the city planners and council turned down because it didn’t meet the city plan?
No, I didn’t think you did. In Toronto, planning doesn’t work that way. Instead, the usual procedure is hardly different from what’s happening at the southeast corner of Bathurst and St. Clair, to use one example. There a developer opened an office in January and started selling condos for a 25-storey tower he wants to build.
Responding to neighbourhood concerns, the councillor called a community meeting a few months later where the developer reported he had sold most of the 324 units. The city planner said she’d been considering an even higher building on the site for the last two years. Her report said the city’s official plan designated the area as a mixed-use, mid-rise area where a building could be no more than 30 metres high or about 10 storeys.
Many at the meeting were pleased to learn that the city would not permit anything more than 10 storeys. A few said they welcomed the condo project since it would allow them to buy into an area they couldn’t otherwise afford. Some said that since other buildings in the block were two, three and four storeys, even a 10-storey building would be too much. The developer said that since there was a 22-storey building on the northwest corner and a building only slightly smaller under construction beside it, he thought 28 storeys made sense.
The planner thanked everyone for their opinions and said she’d report to city council.
But she didn’t report.
Instead, she and the councillor called another community meeting in June to talk about the need to do a study of the block on which the development was proposed and the park across the street. What should happen in this quadrant, the councillor and planner asked? Studies had been done on other parts of St. Clair — those studies allowed very high buildings to the west of Bathurst. A similar study was needed here, they said. People were asked to suggest the improvements that should be made in Hillcrest Park, although residents were warned there was no money in the budget for this. It felt like people were being tricked.
Many residents asked if it was true that the developer had bought more properties on the block and might buy out a small apartment building beside his proposed tower and move the residents — it is occupied by individuals who require social supports — into a better facility. There were no answers. The meeting became very contentious since many residents believed the rationale for the study was to change the city’s plan so the developer was not constrained by the 10-storey height limit.
That’s where the matter stands. It seems the city is looking for the rationale to change the plan so the developer gets what he has asked for.
Many hints have been made that, if the developer can get approval for 28 storeys, then the city can negotiate for money under Section 37 of the Planning Act. For the 22-storey building on the northwest corner, negotiations swept aside the 10-storey limit and produced $1 million, which helped renovate the Artscape Wychwood Barns — a two-storey community facility a few blocks away. The Artscape Barns is a great success, but some residents are unwilling to sell their soul to do something like that again.
Yet it looks like that’s what is happening. Planning in this city seems to be about finding a way to loosen the agreed-upon land-use constraints so developers can have their way. It should be about creating a plan that will make a vibrant city and provide predictability for developers and for the community. Look in any corner of the city and it’s abundantly clear city council doesn’t agree with planning for the future. It only wants to accommodate developers.
Couldn’t we stop this short-sightedness for a minute and focus on strong plans for neighbourhoods?
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–
A builder’s plan to fill Toronto’s nooks and crevices
John Bentley Mays – Globe and Mail
If the residential intensification of Toronto continues to roll forward at its current quick pace, the last of the large downtown parking lots will soon disappear under a shiny condominium block. When these and other easily exploitable spaces in the central city vanish, where will the new housing go?
One option for residential developers, of course, is ripping out pieces of the city’s old main street fabric to make room for apartment buildings. This might not be as bad as it sounds. Many a tired Hogtown streetscape needs freshening up, and something new could do the trick … if, of course, the thing that gets built is significantly better, architecturally and from an urban design standpoint, than what has been lost. I know that’s a big if. Torontonians should surely be vigilant about the design quality of (especially) the mid-rise dwellings city hall wants to see on our principal avenues.
Or, following the lead suggested by a new complex from Context Developments, real estate entrepreneurs could take seriously the difficult nooks and crevices that more timid developers have avoided or written off as unbuildable, and come up with intelligent strategies for dropping stacks of living units into them.
The hodgepodge build-out of downtown Toronto in the 19th century left numerous crannies of this kind in the generally rational grid defined by streets and roads. To its credit, Context has figured out a way to fuse and fill some of these cranky spots with housing that is urbane, original and well-knit into the urban landscape. The work is called Context King West, and consists of eight tightly packed, semi-detached condominium blocks that will rise from the inner reaches of a dense city block at the intersection of Portland Street and King Street West.
Viewed from nearby King Street, the top edges of the project’s white concrete and glass components, which range in height from 10 to 18 storeys and are to be crowned with trees, will describe a bright, jagged line against the sky. The strongly sculpted upper portions of these light blocks will probably seem to float like clouds above the dark old facades pushed up against the sidewalk. The ground-hugging, arched brick base, intended for shops and galleries, will be mostly hidden behind the line of these building facades, but it will be linked to the city by pathways and lanes that penetrate the street wall on all sides.
The combination of bricks, concrete and glass is attractive, but what makes Context King West very interesting is its more general imaginative response to a complicated situation in the heart of the city.
The story of the 450-unit project began when Context co-founder and president Howard Cohen discovered two small scraps of available land inside a block of old warehouses and office structures just east of Bathurst Street. He was able to cobble together an oddly-shaped, tight building site from the scraps, which were strung out behind antique facades along a north-south line running from Adelaide Street West down to King Street.
Now that he had a site, albeit a peculiar one, the developer then had to determine how best to hook it up to the nearby streets and the city beyond. To help him do this job, he recruited Ken Greenberg, the distinguished independent urban planner and Toronto’s most astute professional student (now that Jane Jacobs is gone) of what makes good cities tick.
To high-rise designer David Pontarini, founding partner in Hariri Pontarini Architects (HPA), went the task of crafting a residential structure that would sit comfortably on the long, skinny site Mr. Cohen had fashioned. It would have to deliver a fresh jolt of visual electricity to the city – Mr. Cohen is not known for doing tiresome buildings – but it would need to be polite to the sturdy old Victorians standing on the perimeter of the block. (Mr. Pontarini told me that HPA associate Michael Conway assisted him on the design.)
Working together, Mr. Pontarini and Mr. Greenberg have created an unusual building for an eccentric place. Instead of adding density to the city simply by piling up units until the stack touches the sky, for example, the creative team has achieved this desirable objective by distributing the load horizontally, along the site’s long axis. The result is a smart alternative to the standard tower form that could work well in other odd locations where high density is called for, but a tall building is unwanted.
In another instance of thoughtful urbanism, the scheme drafted for Mr. Cohen takes into account not merely the hole the developer wanted to plug, but also the entire block, including the public spaces and passageways needed to open the block to the pulse of metropolitan life. In every respect, Context King West is mindful city-building – something that urban architecture should be, always and everywhere.
—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
—————————————————————————————————–

















