Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Tag Archives: trump international hotel

Developers of Toronto’s Trump Hotel to seek $750,000 in damages from disgruntled buyers

Susan Pigg – Toronto Star

Developers of Toronto’s Trump International Hotel and Tower have served notice they plan to sue buyers trying to flee the ill-fated hotel-condo project.

In a statement of defence and counterclaim filed with lawyers for the buyers, but which may not yet be filed with the courts, Talon said it’s seeking $750,000 in damages from disgruntled buyers who’ve launched a multi-million lawsuit against Talon and Donald Trump.

They also plan to seek court approval to seize deposits averaging more than $175,000.

“Talon intends to continue to work with the large number of purchasers of hotel units who have demonstrated that they intend to comply with their contractual obligations to Talon. We are very happy to be moving forward with bringing our excited buyers into the fold as owners of an asset they’ll be proud to own for a long time,” says a spokesperson for Talon.

As the official deadline for final payments on its pricey hotel-condo units came and went Thursday, Talon was not only denying all allegations by four buyers who claim they were “victims of an investment scheme and conspiracy,” but silent on whether other buyers can have extensions.

A number, many international investors, have asked for a delay until into the new year. Their concern isn’t the more than $5,000 a month they are now paying in maintenance fees, taxes and other charges on the pricey hotel-condo units.

Their fear is the long-term risks of taking possession of units in a project that could face lawsuits which could drag on for years and cost Talon millions.

“Because it’s so fresh, everyone is scrambling – the situation is so tenuous right now that everyone wants time to calm down a little bit so they can wrap their heads around what’s going on and get some answers to what kind of risk is involved here,” said one person involved in the request for an extension.

“Extensions are pretty common (in condo projects) based on financing issues. It’s just not to this degree and involving so many people.”

In a 27-page legal document dated Dec. 12, Talon denies all allegations made in a lawsuit file Nov. 21 by four Canadian investors who allege Talon convinced novice investors to buy units worth more than $700,000 based on “reckless and negligent misrepresentations” of the money they would make as part of the hotel’s rental pool.

Instead, hotel occupancy rates and daily rates are significantly less than projected, disgruntled buyers say.

Any representations made to buyers were not a guarantee but “based on information which was accurate at the time made,” says Talon in its statement of defence.

“A real estate investment is, by its nature, speculative,” and subject to “risks,” Talon states, especially a luxury hotel property subject to cyclical downturns based on economic conditions, competition, the health of the travel industry and unpreventable events like terrorist attacks, war and the outbreak of a contagious disease like SARs.

“Any business requires sufficient time to build its business (a ramp-up period) in order to achieve any level of success … The Plaintiffs could not have reasonably expected that the levels as allegedly represented would occur immediately following the opening of the hotel.”

Talon also points out that none of those buyers now claiming a “material change” under the Condominium Act – based on maintenance and other fees which they found out last February were some 30 to 50% more than anticipated – sought to rescind their deals within the 10 day period allowed under the Act.”

“At all material times these Plaintiffs knew or ought to have known agreeing to this transaction was an investment risk for which there was no guarantee of return on their investment,” says Talon.

—————————————————————————————————–
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960

Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

—————————————————————————————————–


Incoming search terms
  • why condotel buyers are losing money at a rate of $175 per day per unit because maintenance fees are larger than revenue
  • contractor for the trump tower in toronto roofing contractor
  • janice weisfeld toronto
  • Why investors have reservations about Trump tower

    Tara Perkins and Oliver Moore – The Globe and Mail

    Build it well and they will come.

    That appears to be the philosophy of Val Levitan, chief executive officer of Talon International Development Inc., the developer of Toronto’s Trump International Hotel & Tower. He stopped repeatedly as he walked through the ornate building, pointing out the granite, the onyx, the chandeliers.

    “Occupancy is the wrong thing to focus on,” he says. “What’s important to focus on is the customer appreciation for the product. If the customer appreciates the product, then we are convinced we can get the rates that we are aiming for.”

    But some of the investors who have bought rooms in the hotel do not want to wait around to find out.

    They have received statements showing that rates for rooms and hotel occupancy have both been lower than they had expected, costing them tens of thousands of dollars, and they allege that the developer proffered marketing materials that used financial projections to portray the units as a lucrative investment.

    “They went from a position where they thought this was a safe investment with huge returns to a position where they had substantial losses,” said Javad Heydary, a lawyer who is representing four buyers involved in multimillion-dollar lawsuits over their purchases and is talking to dozens more.

    If financial projections were given, the sales tactic would appear to break an agreement with the Ontario Securities Commission.

    The developer insists that it did not do so and also points to a 36-page disclosure document it says was given to buyers in which it emphasizes that there are no assurances or guarantees when it comes to revenues. The OSC is investigating.

    This is only one problem bedevilling the project.

    Other buyers have tried to walk away from their purchase and are being sued by the developers. And next Thursday, ownership of the hotel units will be transferred from Talon to the buyers, some of whom say they feel duped, cannot get financing to complete the deal and wish they had never bought them.

    Mr. Levitan said he sympathizes on a personal level, but “in the end, what we need to understand is all of us have commitments and all of us need to stick with our agreements. …

    “Impatient businessmen will lose money,” he added. “It’s not about investment, it’s about being a businessperson, and a businessperson cannot be in the moment. There’s no stopwatch here. … The revenues will grow, the average daily rate will grow, the occupancy will grow.”

    The point was echoed by one of the building’s most high-profile buyers. New Jersey physician Stephen Soloway, who has bought dozens of Trump properties, appeared in a video extolling the development and still believes in its merits.

    “A hotel is a product and that product may take time to get moving, to get off the ground,” Dr. Soloway argued. “I do believe that it will receive accolades and I believe that the people who are currently unhappy with the extra costs will be very happy in the future.”

    He said he got “no special deals” for appearing in the video. The other buyer featured in the video is reportedly suing the developer and could not be reached.

    Talon began selling units in the Trump building in late 2004. The 65-storey tower has 118 regular condominiums and 261 hotel condos, which are at the centre of this controversy.

    The proposition was this: Buy a hotel room and stay in it as much as you want. If you choose, sign up for the reservation program. Then, when you are not occupying your room, it will be put into a pool that is available for hotel guests. You will receive revenues based on the hotel rates and pay hotel operating expenses and other costs. Unit owners are responsible for costs ranging from keeping the reception desk going to keeping their unit stocked with toilet paper and slippers.

    It’s something that sets the Trump tower apart from other luxury hotel-condo buildings, such as the Ritz-Carlton or the Shangri-La. “Our goal was to provide the opportunity for regular investors – not superwealthy, but regular investors – to invest in the hotel industry,” Mr. Levitan said.

    An OSC exemption allowed the developers to market the units with reduced regulatory hassle and the suit alleges that this made it easier to attract novice investors who did not have all the information they needed to make a sound decision.

    “Over 90% of them are middle-class with limited resources,” Mr. Heydary said. “By no means are they a sophisticated investor. … Some of them don’t even speak English.”

    Among his clients is Ilsan Kim, a 27-year-old who lives in St. Brides, Alta. He heard about the Trump tower in 2007 and contacted a Toronto real-estate agent to look into buying a unit. Now, he is suing Mr. Levitan, Talon, Talon’s billionaire chairman, Alex Shnaider, and Donald Trump.

    The suit, filed in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, claims that a salesperson with the developer provided a PowerPoint presentation containing very specific information about projected returns from the purchase of a hotel unit. A salesperson allegedly said also Mr. Kim would be able to obtain mortgage financing if he put 25% down.

    Mr. Kim agreed to buy a $867,000 unit in January, 2007. He took interim occupancy of the unit in February, and since then the fees he has had to pay have outweighed the revenue from the room. A statement he received in October said the quarterly occupancy rate was 30.43% and the average nightly rental rate was $444. His unit was rented out only one night in August.

    The net revenue for the three-month period came to $8,865.92 and the occupancy fees were $24,879.90, according to the lawsuit. This adds up to a loss of $16,013.98 – about $175 a day.

    Mr. Kim is also struggling to find a mortgage, which he alleges he was told would be readily available from lenders. He has been turned down by the banks and would have to put down 50% to get one because banks have deemed the units to be commercial investments, according to the lawsuit.

    The most contentious part of the lawsuit is the allegation that Talon offered specific cash-flow projections – contrary to the OSC exemption – that helped to convince would-be buyers.

    The company insists that this did not happen. “We have never given any financial projections. Never,” Mr. Levitan said. “We have never discussed any financial projections.”

    A copy of the disclosure document that Talon provided to The Globe and Mail states: “Neither the declarant, the hotel operator nor the sales agents for the hotel condominium make any representation that any hotel unit will be able to be rented at any particular rate or for any particular period of time.”

    But the buyers who are suing say marketing materials with return-on-investment estimates – allegedly showing specific cash-flow projections based on projected occupancy levels of 55 to 75% – played a major role in their decision.

    In an e-mailed statement, Talon said it does not agree that the marketing materials constituted “a forecast or projection. Further, Talon has complied with the terms of the [OSC] ruling.”

    The Ontario Securities Commission exempted the project from having to offer investors a prospectus (an official sales document for substantial and complex investments that is costly to prepare) on the condition that neither Talon, Trump nor any sales agents “will make any representation that any hotel unit will be able to be rented at any particular rate, or for any particular period of time” and that “prospective purchasers of hotel units will not be provided with rental or cash-flow forecasts or guarantees or any other form of financial projection.”

    The OSC, which has granted similar exemptions to other condo projects, is probing the allegations. “We are looking into this matter to determine compliance with the order, and will take regulatory action if warranted,” said Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington, a spokeswoman for the regulator.

    —————————————————————————————————–
    Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960

    Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
    who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    —————————————————————————————————–


    Incoming search terms
  • isilsan com
  • trump hotel collection officers
  • artist live/work loft toronto
  • So what happened to Talon hotel development unhappy buyers
  • sahar maryam mansouri
  • storage space condominium trump tower toronto
  • saharmaryam mansouri
  • Talon developer unhappy buyers (chat roon)
  • Talon hotel developer latest news
  • alex shnailder ontario securities
  • Toronto’s Trump Tower condo closing date extended after OSC gets involved

    Canadian Press

    Talon International Inc. has extended the closing date for the sale of hotel condominium units at Trump International Hotel and Tower Toronto in order to deal with inquiries by the Ontario Securities Commission.

    The new deadline of Dec. 13 come as Talon faces a lawsuit from a group of investors, who have also sought a formal investigation by the OSC.

    The former deadline was Thursday.

    Talon developed and owns the property and licenses the Trump brand name. A company affiliated with U.S. celebrity businessman Donald Trump manages the hotel for Talon.

    The company said it was fully co-operating with the provincial securities regulator, which has been asked for an investigation by a group of investors who are suing Trump and Talon and individuals associated with the two businesses.

    “The extension has been made to allow more time for Talon to respond to recent inquiries made by the Ontario Securities Commission,” Talon said in a brief statement Monday.

    In a statement issued Sunday evening, the group of investors said their appeal to the OSC was a “last-bid effort” to obtain help before the closing date, which had been Nov. 29 before the extension was announced.

    The investors said every Canadian bank has refused to offer financing to them, despite assurances from Talon that hotel units could be easily financed as residential condo units.

    The investors said they’ve learned that Canadian banks are treating the hotel project as a commercial enterprise and are refusing financing as a condo purchase.

    They also say their investments are running up losses of more than $175 a day per unit because of the current shortfall between maintenance fees and hotel unit revenues.

    Investors say they’re now faced with either having to come up with substantial amounts of cash to close or resort to secondary financial institutions which will only provide partial financing for the project as a commercial investment at high interest rates.

    The investors have launched a multi-million dollar lawsuit against Talon and their directors, as well as a number of Trump organizations and their directors, including Donald Trump Sr.

    The plaintiffs’ claims allege that investors were persuaded into investing in the Trump Hotel on the basis of alleged negligent or reckless misrepresentations, and that promises and projections offered were allegedly inaccurate and in contravention of securities regulations.

    None of the allegations have been proven in court.

    In 2004, when the hotel project was first being planned, the investors say Talon sought permission from the OSC to be exempt from regulatory requirements for commercial investments, and provided a number of promises and conditions to obtain those exemptions.

    In granting an exemption, the OSC made it a strict condition that Talon and Trump Hotel not market the hotel units as a cash-flow investment.

    —————————————————————————————————–
    Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960

    Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
    They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
    who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.

    —————————————————————————————————–


    Incoming search terms
  • realty toronto - trump international
  • trump tower toronto rental programme
  • i need a lawyer to fight ontario security commission
  • stephen soloway lawsuit
  • why donald trump toronto condo dropped
  • show
     
    close
    You want that dream home? Why you'll have to join the line in this thin housing market http://t.co/IRN3rvwxjE