Toronto Loft Conversions

We know classic brick and beam lofts! From warehouses to factories to churches, Laurin and Natalie want to help you find your perfect new loft. More »

Modern Toronto Lofts

Not just converted lofts, we can help you find the latest cool and modern space. There are tons of new urban spaces across the city. More »

Unique Toronto Homes

Not just lofts, we can also help you find that perfect house. From the latest architectural marvel to a piece of Toronto\'s Victorian past, the best and most creative spaces abound. More »

Condos in Toronto

We started off selling mainly condos, helping first time buyers get a foothold in the Toronto real estate market. Now working with investors and helping empty nesters find that perfect luxury suite. More »

Toronto Real Estate

For all of your Toronto real estate needs, contact the Jeffrey Team. Laurin and Natalie are dedicated to helping you find that perfect and unique new home to call your own. More »

 

Tag Archives: us recession

How Canada Squares Up

By Richard Blackwell – Globe and Mail

The growth may have be meagre, but the 0.4% annualized increase in GDP in the third quarter marked the first rise since the third quarter of 2008. That means, at least by the classic definition, that Canada is out of recession.

At one point, early in 2009, there were fears the downturn might spiral into a lengthy worldwide depression, with a contagion taking the global financial sector down the drain. That didn’t happen, and it is now possible to begin to examine how Canada fared compared with the rest of the world, and relative to previous recessions.

VERSUS EARLIER RECESSIONS

Of the Canadian recessions in the early 1980s and early 1990s, the first was by far the deepest and longest, lasting six quarters. Unemployment spiked to the 13% level.

The 1990s recession lasted four quarters and was about as severe as the one just ended, when measured by the shrinkage of the economy. But unemployment rose as high as 12% and it took a long time for the job market to recover.

This time Canada caught the recession flu from outside, mainly from the United States, and the country was in good shape with a significant federal budget surplus and solid financial institutions. As the recession took hold, quick interest rate cuts and huge stimulus helped turned the tide.

“It wasn’t primarily our fault, and we were fairly well prepared,” said University of Toronto economics professor Peter Dungan.

One reason for the relatively better performance on the jobless front in this recession, he said, is that in the 1980s and 1990s the labour force was growing much more quickly. Higher population growth, and the shift of women and baby boomers into the labour force exacerbated unemployment problems in those days.

Economist Dale Orr points out that it is not clear if the job market in Canada will recover quickly this time. Even though the economy is growing again, signs of employment picking up are still tentative.

“We’re still not home free with respect to employment, so maybe we should not jump to conclusions yet,” he said. Some important sectors – such as automotive manufacturing or forestry – are undergoing structural shifts and jobs in those industries may never return to earlier levels.

COMPARED WITH OTHER COUNTRIES

Canada’s downturn has been about as deep as that in the United States, and lasted roughly the same length of time. One key difference is that the U.S. has seen unemployment numbers jump much more sharply than here.

The credit crunch in the U.S. was worse than in Canada, Mr. Dungan noted, forcing corporations to make more severe job cuts. Housing and real estate problems were also more severe south of the border.

Compared with other countries around the world, Canada is somewhere in the middle of the pack.

Japan and much of the euro zone experienced more severe recessions, said Toronto-Dominion Bank senior economist Richard Kelly, although some of those countries are bouncing back quickly now. Few industrialized countries have actually outperformed Canada, with the exception of Australia, which has already recovered enough to increase interest rates.

The burgeoning economies of India and China slowed during the recession, but still managed to grow at levels that would make much of the world green with envy. China, for example will likely see its economy expand by 8% in 2009, according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

AMONG PROVINCES

This recession was unusual, compared with earlier ones, in that every province showed a decline in GDP, Mr. Orr said. “In a lot of other years when Canada’s growth was negative, there was usually some province that wasn’t negative.”

Still, the reasons for the recession weren’t the same in every province. Ontario was hit by a downturn in the auto sector, Alberta was hammered by lower oil prices, while demand for B.C.’s forestry products slumped.

Quebec, which was battered in earlier recessions, fared slightly better this time because its aerospace industry held up better than auto manufacturing.

One common factor that damaged all provinces was the credit crunch, Mr. Orr said. That hurt businesses of every type and contributed to the decline in the housing market across the country.

————————————————————————————————————

Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information  -  416-388-1960

————————————————————————————————————

Carney sees recovery on the horizon

Canada’s cen­tral bank says pace of GDP growth likely to pick up through rest of 2009

Kevin CarmichaelGlobe and Mail

The evi­dence sup­port­ing a global eco­nomic recov­ery is gath­er­ing force faster than gov­ern­ments and econ­o­mists were expecting.

Canada’s cen­tral bank said Thurs­day that the country’s gross domes­tic prod­uct likely will grow at a faster pace over the sec­ond half of 2009 than the 2.2% annu­al­ized rate it pre­dicted in July.

Bank of Canada Gov­er­nor Mark Carney’s revised out­look, based on an array of pos­i­tive indi­ca­tors rang­ing from ris­ing con­sumer con­fi­dence to fresh demand for auto­mo­biles, was bol­stered by gov­ern­ment reports in Ottawa and Wash­ing­ton that showed North Amer­i­can trade sprang back to life in July.

Imports and exports jumped in both the United States and Canada, amid demand for auto­mo­biles, auto­mo­tive parts, and energy, sig­nalling that the $2-trillion (U.S.) that gov­ern­ments have pumped into the world econ­omy to reverse the finan­cial cri­sis is hav­ing the desired effect.

Fol­low­ing a deep, syn­chro­nous reces­sion, recent indi­ca­tors point to the start of recov­ery in major economies, sup­ported by aggres­sive pol­icy stim­u­lus and the sta­bi­liza­tion of global finan­cial mar­kets,” the Bank of Canada, which demurred from mak­ing a new GDP fore­cast, said in its lat­est pol­icy statement.

The North Amer­i­can trade fig­ures were echoed in France, where the gov­ern­ment said inter­na­tional ship­ments by the world’s sixth-largest exporter soared 9% in July. Stock mar­kets in New York, Toronto, Sao Paulo, Lon­don and Frank­furt all rose on a gen­eral sen­ti­ment that a global recov­ery is afoot.

Com­pared to where we were a few months ago, it should be cel­e­brated,” Andrew Tilton, an econ­o­mist at Gold­man Sachs Group in New York, said of the mount­ing evi­dence that the world econ­omy is mend­ing quickly. “Momen­tum has turned in terms of growth.”

But the poten­tial cel­e­brants in the finance min­istries and the cen­tral banks of the world’s major economies – who have demon­strated uncom­mon unity in fight­ing the finan­cial cri­sis – are show­ing con­sid­er­able restraint in claim­ing victory.

Instead, they are dig­ging in to ensure they fin­ish the job.

Despite faster growth, the Bank of Canada retained its extra­or­di­nary pledge to leave its bench­mark lend­ing rate at a record low of 0.25% until June, 2010, bar­ring an unfore­seen burst of infla­tion. Pol­icy mak­ers also warned that “per­sis­tent strength” in the Cana­dian dol­lar could derail the recov­ery by mak­ing Cana­dian exports less competitive.

In updat­ing the Cana­dian government’s fis­cal pro­jec­tions yes­ter­day – which include a revised fore­cast for a bud­get deficit of $55.9-billion in the cur­rent fis­cal year – the best Finance Min­is­ter Jim Fla­herty said about the econ­omy was that it is in the “early stages of a frag­ile recov­ery,” telling an audi­ence in Vic­to­ria that he would push ahead with his stim­u­lus program.

That cau­tion­ary note is echo­ing among pol­icy mak­ers around the globe.

U.S. Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Tim­o­thy Gei­th­ner said yes­ter­day in Wash­ing­ton that the recov­ery would fea­ture “more than the usual ups and downs” and that he would pro­ceed care­fully in unwind­ing the Obama administration’s stim­u­lus measures.

Fed­eral Reserve Bank of Atlanta pres­i­dent Den­nis Lock­hart pre­dicted the rebound would be “lack­lus­tre,” while Reserve Bank of New Zealand gov­er­nor Alan Bol­lard said it would be “patchy.”

The rea­son for such wari­ness is to push back pres­sure to reverse spend­ing pro­grams that are pil­ing up debt.

When the econ­omy is walk­ing solely with the aid of fis­cal and mon­e­tary crutches, it’s not advis­able to whip them away,” said Axel Weber, Bun­des­bank pres­i­dent and Euro­pean Cen­tral Bank coun­cil mem­ber, in Ploen, Germany.

The eco­nomic data isn’t uni­ver­sally strong. As the North Amer­i­can econ­omy showed signs of life in July, Japan­ese machin­ery orders fell to a record low, a gov­ern­ment report said yes­ter­day. In Rome, new fig­ures showed that Ital­ian exports fell 3.7% in the sec­ond quarter.

A sense of con­fi­dence also was appar­ent in a sur­vey of 1,153 of Royal LeP­age Real Estate Ser­vices Ltd.’s real estate agents. When asked if they thought the real estate mar­ket recov­ery was sus­tain­able, 61 per cent said “yes”.

The num­ber sur­prised Royal LePage’s chief exec­u­tive, Phil Soper, who said he expected some­thing closer to unre­strained enthu­si­asm among his agents because Canada’s hous­ing mar­ket has ral­lied so strongly this sum­mer.

Clearly, there is a con­cern that inter­est rates are dri­ving so much of the cur­rent strength that a change in pol­icy could bring the cur­rent good times to an end rather abruptly,” Mr. Soper said in an inter­view. “This will be a steady, slow recovery.”

————————————————————————————————————

Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion  -  416−388−1960

————————————————————————————————————

What goes up doesn’t always come down

Toronto finds itself in a sur­pris­ing sit­u­a­tion: The econ­omy stalled, but house prices didn’t

Tony Wong – Toronto Star

What hap­pens if you had a reces­sion and hous­ing prices didn’t really go down?

That’s the sce­nario Toronto could be in by the end of 2009, as econ­o­mists scram­ble to revise forecasts.

Com­ment: Could find our­selves in? But prices are up 6% over last year, sales vol­ume is up 27% and year-to-date sales are up 2%. Are we not already in a posi­tion where the Toronto real estate mar­ket did not go down?

Toronto hous­ing econ­o­mist Will Dun­ning is fore­cast­ing that the aver­age price of an exist­ing home in the Greater Toronto Area will be $378,700 by the end of this year. His pre­vi­ous fore­cast was for prices to decline to $358,100, or about 5.6% from 2008. That’s in line with the esti­mates of about a 5% decline from most major hous­ing analysts.

The fore­cast has been raised sub­stan­tially,” Dun­ning says. “For the past three months, resale activ­ity has been much stronger than I had been anticipating.”

A $378,700 price is spit­ting dis­tance of the $379,347 aver­age price recorded at the end of 2008. Dun­ning says this year’s aver­age price could sur­pass last year’s.

Com­ment: It already has. As of mid-August, the aver­age sales price was $385,603 for the year to date. That is 1.6% higher than the 2008 aver­age and 1.8% higher than the esti­mate. Guess the “experts” need to revise upwards yet again…

Under that sce­nario, prices would have increased every year since 1996 – a total of 13 straight years.

Com­ment: So small growth every year for 13 years… isn’t that the very oppo­site of a bub­ble? I remem­ber when every­one said there was a Toronto real estate bub­ble. Boy were they ever wrong. Cal­gary and Van­cou­ver were bub­bles – and look what hap­pened there! We did not have one here – and what do you know? Not a sin­gle neg­a­tive year since 1996. If that is  not tes­ta­ment to the strength of the Toronto real estate mar­ket, I do not know what is. And peo­ple call me a booster…

Not bad, con­sid­er­ing that con­sumers have been repeat­edly told this is the biggest eco­nomic down­turn in North Amer­ica since the Great Depression.

Com­ment: Guess that turned out not to be true, as well, eh? And where that even came from, I have no idea. The Great Depres­sion started in 1929 and lasted for years, into the 1930s and even 1940s in some places. We had 9 months of rough times. Hardly com­pa­ra­ble. I would think that those who per­se­vered through that hor­ri­ble time would be greatly offended that we even attempt to com­pare this to what they went through.

These kinds of price increases are not what we expected at all,” says Sal Guatieri, senior econ­o­mist with BMO Cap­i­tal Mar­kets. “Given the eco­nomic back­drop, no one expected hous­ing to bounce back the way it has.”

Com­ment: I expected it. I pre­dicted it. But I am not an “expert” so it didn’t matter.

Those who remem­ber the pre­vi­ous reces­sion won’t soon for­get a hous­ing down­turn that lasted for seven years. Aver­age prices plum­meted from $273,698 in 1989 to $198,150 at the bot­tom in 1996.

Com­ment: Seven years? And we had a few months? Again, where the hell do peo­ple get off mak­ing these com­par­isons? Here we are, about a year after every­thing went wonky, and prices are up 6%. Last time, prices fell 38% over 7 years. Not quite the same sce­nario, ya think?

It is almost incon­ceiv­able to think this reces­sion may not see even one year of retreat­ing prices. But it’s possible.

Com­ment: Pos­si­ble? It has already hap­pened. Unless the bot­tom falls out in the next cou­ple of months – which it most cer­tainly will not.

I guess if you make things afford­able enough, it will gen­er­ate demand.

And all that impact on afford­abil­ity has been on the backs of lower mort­gage rates,” says Guatieri.

Com­ment: Not quite. If the econ­omy is not good, mort­gage rates go down. As the econ­omy improves, rates go up. But if the econ­omy is doing well, that means peo­ple have jobs and money. Which means they can afford higher mort­gage rates. Heck, 20-some-odd years ago, mort­gage rates were close to 20% (as peo­ple like Garth Turner like to keep remind­ing us) yet peo­ple were still buy­ing houses. So why would a small jump to 8% kill every­thing? Rates were at 8% 10 years ago and peo­ple still bought houses. Higher rates will sim­ply not hurt the real estate mar­ket, his­tory proves it.

Accord­ing to a Des­jardins Bank report released yes­ter­day, afford­abil­ity is dete­ri­o­rat­ing as aver­age prices rise in Ontario.

Still, the provin­cial mar­ket remained afford­able despite the increase in prices. The bank warns, how­ever, that “if this trend holds, the market’s jour­ney into afford­able ter­ri­tory will be short lived.”

Com­ment: What jour­ney into afford­able ter­ri­tory? Houses have always been afford­able, that is why we have a real estate mar­ket. Peo­ple didn’t just dis­cover buy­ing and sell­ing houses last Tuesday.

Guatieri calls the hous­ing cli­mate “bizarre” and wor­ries that some con­sumers may be stretch­ing them­selves to get into the market.

Com­ment: Why is it bizarre? Maybe the “reces­sion” was just not as bad as we were told by all the dooms­day­ers and naysay­ers. If every­one was broke and unem­ployed, they would not be buy­ing houses, sim­ple as that.

You have to won­der (if) in two or three years mort­gage rates go back to nor­mal lev­els whether they will still be able to afford the prop­er­ties,” says Guatieri.

Com­ment: I hear this all the time, what exactly is a “nor­mal” mort­gage rate?

The rebound’s strength is even more sur­pris­ing, since the year began with sales down by 50% in Jan­u­ary. The mar­ket started to show pos­i­tive ter­ri­tory in May, with a 2% increase, then posted two con­sec­u­tive records, a 27% increase in June and 28% in July.

Com­ment: And then another 27% in August. Funny, though, the pat­tern above is the usual one. Sales are low in the win­ter and then get bet­ter through the spring, peak­ing in the sum­mer. Just like what we saw. But since there was a “reces­sion” going on, we had to read some­thing sin­is­ter into it. Could also be that peo­ple were scared by all the bad news and bad spin on nor­mal news, thus they waited. When they saw that things were being blown com­pletely out of pro­por­tion, they came out into the sun and started act­ing like nor­mal again. A lot of the sales increases came from the months with lower num­bers. I bet if we move some num­bers around, we would have a pretty nor­mal year.

Data for the first two weeks of August show that this year’s cumu­la­tive exist­ing home sales have sur­passed last year’s sales at the same time.

Guatieri says the bub­ble of the 1980s was dri­ven partly by spec­u­la­tors, while afford­abil­ity with double-digit inter­est rates was “stretched to ridicu­lous levels.”

Com­ment: That was a bub­ble. Prices pretty much tripled in some areas, in about a year. And with mort­gage rates in the dou­ble dig­its, it was a recipe for dis­as­ter. But with low rates and prices ris­ing a bit more than infla­tion, there is sim­ply no dan­ger now.

This time hous­ing prices are still grow­ing faster than income lev­els, but afford­abil­ity was not as stretched thanks to a low-interest-rate pol­icy by the cen­tral bank.

Most econ­o­mists think the party will have to slow at some point.

Over longer peri­ods, growth of employ­ment is the crit­i­cal fac­tor, as it gen­er­ates a need to expand the hous­ing stock,” says Dun­ning. “With employ­ment hav­ing fallen since last fall, there is lim­ited need for new hous­ing activity.”

Com­ment: Except for immi­gra­tion and migra­tion. Toronto gains around 100,000 peo­ple a year from other coun­tries. Never mind peo­ple mov­ing within Canada. Those peo­ple all need some­where to live. And kids grow into adults and want to buy houses and con­dos. It is not just jobs that drive the hous­ing market!

Com­ment: Just remem­ber, the main point is that the news is good. Sales are up, prices are up. And there is no fore­see­able rea­son for that to change any time soon.

————————————————————————————————————

Con­tact the Jef­frey Team for more infor­ma­tion  -  416−388−1960

————————————————————————————————————

show
 
close
You want that dream home? Why you'll have to join the line in this thin housing market http://t.co/IRN3rvwxjE