Tag Archives: waterfront redevelopment
Developer dismayed by Ford threat to waterfront project
John Lorinc – Globe and Mail
The founder of a giant Texas development conglomerate that secured an $800-million deal with Waterfront Toronto to build a 2-million-sq.-ft. mixed-use complex on the East Bayfront says the Ford administration’s threat to pull out of the revitalization effort would “shake our confidence” in the project.
“Who would be the entity we would deal with?” said Gerald Hines, who set up his privately held real estate firm in 1957. The Hines company now has properties in over 100 cities around the world, and controls $22.9-billion in real estate assets.
Mr. Hines, 85, was responding to disparaging comments made this week by Mayor Rob Ford and his brother Doug, who dismissed efforts to redevelop the waterfront as “a boondoggle” and a waste of money. The mayor said Friday the city’s contribution to waterfront revitalization was under review.
But in an interview Friday from his office in Houston, Mr. Hines lauded the Waterfront Toronto agency as “an ethical and professional group” that has created incentives that attract international investors with deep pockets. “We have confidence that they’ll execute their part of the agreement.”
There’s little doubt the agency reeled in a big fish when it finalized an agreement with Hines last summer. The firm has developed projects in cities like Paris, Milan and Barcelona, where it worked with local and state governments on a massive waterfront redevelopment complex involving 1,500 high-rise apartment units, three hotels, and a convention centre.
“Everyone in Barcelona said it would never work, but we now have the highest prices in [the city],” Mr. Hines said, adding that the chance to remake Toronto’s waterfront presented a similar opportunity.
He’s not the only major figure in the development industry to look askance at signals coming out of the mayor’s office.
“If Waterfront Toronto was less effective, people will have to ask the question, where’s the government’s commitment?” says Andrew Barnicke, senior vice-president of DTZ Barnicke Ltd., the firm that negotiated the deal which saw Corus Entertainment move into the first new office complex built on the waterfront in over a generation.
Waterfront Toronto, Mr. Barnicke said, has succeeded in attracting capital investment to the area east of Yonge and dismissed suggestions that the agency has little to show for the $750-million it has spent to date. “Probably the most difficult thing in doing new district development is getting the planning right and doing the infrastructure. Building the buildings isn’t so difficult.”
Since 2008, the agency, which is jointly owned by all three levels of government, has approved three major development deals worth $1.3-billion. The Corus building opened last year, and construction on the new waterfront campus for George Brown College, a $175-million venture, is under way. Infrastructure Ontario is in the process of tendering a $700-million development deal to build 8,000–10,000 units of housing in the West Donlands for the Pan Am Games athletes’ village.
While Mr. Ford dismissed the waterfront as a pet project of former mayor David Miller, the agency itself dates back to the Mike Harris era and the city’s unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Olympics under Mel Lastman. The three levels at the time each pledged $500-million for the revitalization effort.
Conservative finance minister Jim Flaherty is currently responsible for Ottawa’s contribution. Federal officials have signed off on the agency’s procurement rules. A spokesperson for Ontario infrastructure minister Bob Chiarelli said in an e-mail that the province “has no intentions of pulling out from Waterfront Toronto.”
According to the agency’s figures, almost half of the funding provided since 2001 has come from the federal government, while Queen’s Park has anted up $240-million and the city just $162-million.
During the coming nine years, the city has earmarked $193-million in capital spending on waterfront projects, including an LRT and new public spaces. Budget documents show the city anticipates an additional $106-million in operating expenses associated with waterfront redevelopment. But waterfront officials estimate that land development will increase property values in the East Bayfront and West Donlands by almost $10-billion, generating an estimated $136-million in additional annual property taxes.
———————————————————————————————————————
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416−388−1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
———————————————————————————————————————
Incoming search terms
What’s up with Toronto’s official plan?
John Lorinc – Globe and Mail
A key piece of David Miller’s green roofs strategy may cave in next week when city council debates a motion from the planning and growth management committee to exempt industrial buildings.
Will it be a sign of what’s to come?
Mayor Rob Ford’s hand-picked chair, Peter Milczyn (Etobicoke Lakeshore), has signalled that he intends to shake up the city’s planning rules. At the committee’s inaugural session, it voted to ask council to rescind the notorious driveway restrictions that made news during the election, and it appears that other Miller-era development policies may also be on the chopping block.
There’s little question that planning will become a high-profile issue this term. While Mr. Ford demonstrates little interest in growth management and has threatened to freeze spending on waterfront redevelopment, his bid to extend the Sheppard subway will almost certainly mean disruption and intensification for the residential neighbourhoods along the proposed route.
Dealing with the consequences of such moves has fallen to Mr. Milczyn, an architect who endorsed Mr. Ford in the final days of the election. He’s been given a great deal of latitude to press ahead with planning changes that could significantly alter Toronto’s landscape.
Here’s a taste of what’s in store:
Official Plan Redux
Toronto’s official plan is up for a mandated review in 2011, but it’s not yet clear whether the city plans to tweak the five-year-old document or pursue major changes. “We’re interested to see if [the review] is going to be a shampoo and a haircut or whether they’ll take a holistic look at the problems with the OP,” says Stephen Deveaux, Tribute Communities vice-president of land development.
Development is taking place according to the plan’s guidelines, insists Kerri Voumvakis, the city’s acting director of policy and research. But Mr. Milczyn is less certain. He wants to make the OP more precise so neighbourhoods are protected from encroaching development.
Despite his committee’s willingness to gut some environmental planning policies, Mr. Milczyn claims he also wants to promote improved urban and architectural design beyond the waterfront and downtown tourist areas. He also sees the anticipated sell-off of city-owned real estate as an opportunity to “create new, high-quality public spaces” by requiring purchasers to incorporate urban design elements in redevelopment plans.
Harmonized Zoning Bylaw: The Sequel
One of the previous council’s final moves was the approval of a harmonized zoning by-law, a highly technical eight-year undertaking intended to combine the zoning rules of all the pre-amalgamation municipalities.
Since the fall, however, the Ontario Municipal Board has received almost 700 appeals of the by-law. “That is just ridiculous,” says Stephen Dupuis, CEO of the Building Industry and Land Development Association, predicting the appeals will be a boon for lawyers.
The controversial driveway rules were just the tip of the iceberg, developers contend. Builders are discovering that the massive document contains numerous glitches, some of which are forcing developers to seek rezoning for projects that had already been approved, says Mr. Dupuis.
Employment Lands Conversion
Mr. Ford’s council is almost certain to take a sharply different approach to high-profile battles such as a Smart!Centres bid to build big-box stores on a large tract of employment lands in Leslieville.
While Smart!Centres lost that fight at the OMB, there are still vast tracts of underused employment lands throughout the city, many of which are being targeted by big-box retailers, condo developers and religious institutions.
The city this year will take stock of Toronto’s industrial zones with an eye to determining which ones remain viable for manufacturing. Building industry officials wants the city to relax its rules, noting that land parcels often sit idle because of inflexible zoning. Council has the last word on employment land designations.
———————————————————————————————————————
Contact the Jeffrey Team for more information – 416-388-1960
Laurin & Natalie Jeffrey are Toronto Realtors with Century 21 Regal Realty.
They did not write these articles, they just reproduce them here for people
who are interested in Toronto real estate. They do not work for any builders.
———————————————————————————————————————


















